Skip to main content

Full text of "The Jewish Strategy"

See other formats

The Jewish Strategy 

The Jewish 




Box 762 Earlysville Virginia 22936 USA. 

The Jewish Strategy 

Copyright ©2002 Kevin Alfred Strom 

third printing, June 2005 

The publication of this book is made possible in part 

through the generosity of the late 

William Gayley Simpson and Harriet Simpson. 

ISBN 0-9715999-0-4 

This edition printed on acid-free paper. 

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a 
retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means — electronic, 
mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other — except for brief quotations in 
reviews, without the prior permission of the publisher. 

Kevin Alfred Strom 

Publishers and Booksellers 
Box 762, Earlysville, Virginia 22936, United States of America 


Autobiographical Note 

I was born near Corpus Christi, Texas, on 7th July, 1908. 

My first name, an obvious palindrome, has been the burden 
of the eldest or only son for six generations. 

I was sent to a high school in Illinois. After two years of it, 
including an extraordinarily severe winter that landed me in a 
hospital for one of the first mastoidectomies performed as more 
than a daring experiment, I decided that the one insoluble histor- 
ical problem was why anyone had taken the Midwest away from 
the Indians, and so I went to California. There I entered what 
everyone knew was the best high school in the country because 
the equipment for dramatic productions on the stage cost more 
than had been spent for such essentials elsewhere. The "educa- 
tors" there had already made great progress in sabotaging educa- 
tion, so, just to have something to occupy my mind, I began the 
study of Sanskrit, using Max Miiller's handbooks and Monier 
Williams' grammar. I did feel the need for some tuition, however, 
and by the most extraordinary good luck I found a Hindu who 
really knew Sanskrit. He was a missionary who, although he 
never quite admitted as much to me, had come to the United 
States to ease the financial burdens of dowagers who had more 
money than they could spend. He told them that, with proper 
care and nourishment of their beautiful souls, they would, in 
their next incarnation, certainly become as lithe as, and certainly 
even more fetching than, Greta Garbo, so I am sure he gave them 
their money's worth. At this period in my adolescence, I also 
amused myself in my spare time by going around to watch the 
holy men and holier females pitch the woo at the simple-minded, 
and I learned much from the many performances I attended, 
from Aimee Semple McPherson's shows for the masses in the 
theatre called Angelus Temple to Katherine Tingley's select enter- 
tainments for high-brow suckers on her then elegant estate near 
San Diego. 

I entered Pomona College in Claremont, California, when I 
was sixteen. 

I married Grace Needham in 1930. Whatever I may have 
achieved, I owe entirely to the sustaining power through all subse- 
quent years of an unfailing devotion for which I cannot rationally 

As a result of the preparations, begun in the late autumn of 
1929, for the election of Roosevelt in 1932, I spent several years 
in a small publishing business, learning that I was not destined to 
become a financial giant. 

I began graduate study at the University of Illinois under 
Professor William Abbott Oldfather, whom many considered the 
most distinguished Classical Philologist in this country. My first 
book was a parergon, a critical and annotated translation from 
the Sanskrit of The Little Clay Cart, published in 1938. 

I received the degree of Philosophiae Doctor in 1940. I may 
add that, given the great fear of "inbreeding," I am the only per- 
son to receive the degree in Classics at the University of Illinois 
whom the Department determined to retain permanently. I 
began teaching graduate classes immediately after receiving the 
degree. For a considerable number of years I also gave graduate 
courses in the Renaissance, which put me also in the Department 
of Spanish and Italian, of which my good friend, Professor John 
Van Home, was the head. 

At the suggestion of a military friend, I agreed, sometime in 
1941, to join a secret subsidiary of the War Department, and did 
so as soon as my academic responsibilities would permit, in 1942, 
remaining there until the autumn of 1945. By good luck, I found 
myself in charge of a rapidly expanding department, and soon 
advanced from Analyst to Director of Research, finding myself 
responsible for the work of c. 175 persons. The work was harrow- 
ing, for various reasons, but extremely instructive. I learned, for 
example, the ultimate secret of Pearl Harbor, which was evidently 

unknown to Admiral Theobald and which was not disclosed in 
print until 1981 (in my America s Decline, page 7). 

I returned to the University in 1945 as an Assistant Profes- 
sor, became an Associate Professor in 1947, and Professor in 
1953. I held a Guggenheim Fellowship in 1946-47, and a Ful- 
bright (Italy), 1953-54. I retired as Emeritus in 1977. (Two days 
after my retirement, I was amazed to discover from events that 
then began that the Administration, which has hated me cor- 
dially, was also sufficiently afraid of me to defer an attack on the 
Department's scholarly standing until after my retirement. I 
don't mean that I had been able to keep it near the distinction it 
had under Oldfather — I knew that couldn't be done when I 
resigned in disgust as departmental office boy — and thought it 
had sadly deteriorated; that was because I had not estimated how 
much worse things could become.) 

Strange as it must now seem, I left the District of Corrup- 
tion in 1945 with the firm conviction that the unbearable stench 
of that vast cesspool could not long be confined, and that when 
the facts of the Crusade to Save the Soviet and other operations 
became known, as they inevitably must, the indignation of the 
American people would produce a reaction of such vehemence 
and violence that it could never be forgotten in history. That con- 
fidence was not shaken until 1954. In the following year, my 
friend, Professor Willmoore Kendall, who had long desiderated a 
"conservative" antidote to the New Republic, etc., and had had 
among his pupils at Yale a bright and wealthy young man, Will- 
iam F. Buckley, Jr., discussed with me plans for the journal, 
which was eventually called National Review and was then 
intended to be approximately what Instauration now is, with, how- 
ever, the significant difference that Instauration was not able to 
start with the expectation of losing $2,000 a week for three years. 
When Kendall told me that he had not been able to find a single 
university professor who dared to join him in writing for the pro- 
jected weekly, I accepted the challenge. That is how I began to 

write on political subjects. That was certainly a grave mistake 
from the standpoint of my career and the comfort of my wife; 
whether it was from other standpoints, I have never quite 
decided. What happened to National Review after it began publi- 
cation, and particularly after Kendall was shouldered out by a 
gang of "professionals" who assured young Buckley that he was 
the Messiah, would be a long and depressing story. 

In 1958 Robert Welch convinced me of his bona fides and 
induced me to join in founding the John Birch Society. I have 
never quite been able to make up my mind as to whether he coz- 
ened me from the first (which my vanity makes me reluctant to 
admit) or sold out later. 

In 1958 I still believed that there was a significant intellec- 
tual difference between the American bourgeoisie and the cattle 
that one sees peering between the slats of large trucks as they con- 
tentedly munch hay on their way to the abattoir. 

Since severing my connections with the Birch hoax, I have 
chosen to write with utter frankness on the dire plight of our race 
and the civilization we created. The reader has been warned. 

Revilo R Oliver 

Table of Contents 

L The Plight of Western Man 1 

IL A Realistic Appraisal of the Jews: 

Their Unparalleled Achievements 5 

IIL The Jewish Strategy at Work: 

Ancient Alexandria 17 

IV. Survival of the Fittest 25 

V. The Jewish Strategy Itself: 

In Their Own Words 35 

VL A Unique Mentality 39 

VIL The Jewish Religion 45 

VIIL Conspiracy or Instinct? 55 

IX. Extermination 57 

X. Genetic Integration 59 

XL Religiosity 61 

XIL Christianity 63 

XIIL The Doom of Nations 81 

Dedicated by the publisher to 

George R Dietz 

without whom 

many of Dr. Oliver's works 

would never have been written. 



IT IS A GRIM AND TERRIBLE FACT that most of the members 
of our own race have had their minds so deformed by centu- 
ries of cunning Jewish propaganda that they have been con- 
ditioned, as effectively as well-trained dogs, to snarl and bite 
when their Jewish masters utter certain key-words, such as "fas- 
cist," "racist," and the like, which take the place of the "sic 'em" 
to which dogs respond. They are, furthermore, so emotionally 
addicted to narcotic fantasies that many of them are both unwill- 
ing and unable to endure the distress of looking at the real world 
about them and thinking rationally about it. They understand- 
ably prefer to close tightly the eyes of their minds and live in the 
dream-world of pleasurable fairy tales, such as they heard in the 
childhood to which they subconsciously long to regress. As 
Kipling neatly characterized them, "If they desire a thing, they 
declare it is true. If they desire it not, though that were death 
itself, they cry aloud, 'It has never been!'" 

It is a tragic and potentially disastrous fact that any candid 
and reasonably comprehensive analysis of our present plight not 
only exposes its author to surreptitious or open reprisals, but also 
alienates many members of our befuddled and perhaps doomed 
race, making them snarl and want to bite the man who would 
make them face an unpleasant reality. Many more are so timo- 
rous that even a hint of disrespect for Jews sends them running 
for cover, like frightened cats, lest the Jews punish them for hav- 
ing listened to impious words. 


Many members of our race, to be sure, secretly resent their 
covert overlords and sometimes venture, when alone with trusted 
friends, to make jests or give other hints that, deep in their 
hearts, they do not venerate the Jews. And if we observe our com- 
patriots, we eventually come to know of many, often persons of 
very considerable wealth, who would gladly read forbidden publi- 
cations, but do not dare subscribe to them, not even through 
post office boxes and under assumed names, lest the Jews dis- 
cover their secret disaffection and punish them for their 
thoughts. A tiny minority of our people, it is true, most com- 
monly the comparatively poor, who think themselves protected 
by their obscurity, more or less openly resent the Jewish domin- 
ion and, by a nice irony, call themselves "anti-Semitic," thus 
thoughtlessly using the nonsense word that strident propaganda 
has implanted in their minds. Some have sufficiently escaped the 
contemporary thought-control to dare to use the word Aryan, 
which is the only convenient and approximately accurate designa- 
tion of our race, although the Jews forbid us to utter it. But even 
these bold spirits are usually ill-informed and prone to strong 
emotions, sometimes seething with a frustrated hatred of the 
international race. 

Although they are few in number, the Aryans who feel real 
hatred disturb the complacency of some Jews, even in this coun- 
try, where their increasingly open control seems absolute. A 
rabbi, for example, in his column in the Chicago Sun-Times, while 
not disavowing the great Jewish hoax about the "six million" who 
were supposedly exterminated by the Germans (and then crawled 
into the United States), quite clearly warned his compatriots that 
their clamors about a "holocaust" might give ideas to the goyim 
and result in the operation of real gas-chambers and in a real 
purge, if the Aryans got out of control in the United States. The 
rabbi is probably an alarmist, but it is true that the ever more bla- 


tant arrogance and terrorism of the Jews is arousing hatred in 
their serfs. It may have been indiscreet of them to erect a monu- 
mental "menorah," thirty feet high, in front of the American 
White House as a symbol of their ownership at the very time that 
they deny to the cringing Americans (who once had a country of 
their own) the right to display a Christmas tree on public prop- 
erty. And instead of quietly abandoning the absurd hoax about 
the "six million," which was devised to pep up the Aryan cattle 
they stampeded into Europe in 1941, and which has netted them 
many billions of dollars from the swindled Germans and much 
more from the rest of the world, they are demanding that the lie 
be forcibly injected into the mind of every American child. That 
is certain to increase resentment, as is, for example, their recent 
attempt to murder a man in Chicago, which, when he was merely 
grievously injured, they explained by claiming they had mistaken 
him for a man they intended to murder, it being assumed that 
since the victim was merely an Aryan dog, that explanation 
should be sufficient comfort for the other dogs. Open terrorism, 
whether violent or pseudo-legal, arouses in some Americans an 
indignant perception of their formerly concealed servitude. I am 
reliably informed that a young man in the northeastern (and 
most corrupted) part of the United States recently read Professor 
Arthur Butz's definitive expose of the "six million" hoax 1 and 
promptly resigned his membership in one of our minuscule 
National Socialist organizations on the grounds that Professor 
Butz had convinced him that Hitler not only did not kill six mil- 
lion Jews, but did not even try. 

1. The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, Institute for Historical Review, P.O. 
Box 2739, Newport Beach, California, 92659, U.S.A. 




Passionate hatred of the Jews is almost certain to be futile, 
for violent emotions prevent rational thought. Berserkers are 
excellent shock troops, if they are under competent command, 
but in all wars, victories are won by generals who lucidly and 
objectively study the capacities and resources of the enemy and as 
objectively measure their own. 

If our race is ever to be liberated from its present masters, 
our independence will not be won by tirades against the Jews, 
wild declamations about their wickedness in serving their own 
interests instead of ours, idle and tautological boasts of our supe- 
riority in terms of our own values, or frantic diatribes about a 
"synagogue of Satan" and a hope that some supernatural power 
will kindly do for us what we refuse to do for ourselves. We must 
begin with a rational understanding of our own situation and of 

We must, first of all, understand that in the real world the 
only test of biological superiority is the ability of a species to sur- 
vive and extend its power, necessarily at the expense of other spe- 
cies. It thus becomes immediately apparent that the international 
race has very solid grounds for its confidence that it is vastly supe- 
rior to all other races. Despite the obscurity of their racial origins, 
it is certain that at one time the Jews must have been a small tribe 
of barbarians, practicing disgusting sexual mutilations and cus- 
toms, observing strange taboos, and otherwise resembling mere 
savages. But that seemingly despicable tribe, by arduous, intelli- 
gent, and indefatigable work for more than twenty-five centuries, 
has, through its own efforts, made itself the major world power 
today and is not far from its great objective, total ownership of 


the entire globe. History provides no parallel for that stupendous 
accomplishment. It must be regarded with respect, even awe. 

When we consider this prodigious achievement, this 
astounding triumph over seemingly insuperable weakness, we 
must recognize that it was made possible only by that race's cohe- 
sion, a biological virtue that I wish our race could emulate, even 
though the Jews forbid us to do so. The Jews have won through 
their intense racial consciousness and effective solidarity. It is 
true that there have been violent dissensions among them when 
their leaders struggle for power, and that in those civil conten- 
tions the various factions have often enlisted goyim against each 
other, but their most violently antagonistic factions have always 
been united in an underlying hatred of those goyim. When, for 
example, Jesus ben Simon was slugging it out with his brother, 
Onias, for the high priesthood in Jerusalem, the capital of their 
ubiquitous race, both tried to make use of the gullible Seleucids, 
but there can be no doubt that each regarded the stupid goyim as 
mere tools, to be broken and discarded when they had served 
their purpose. There is still today a certain tension between the 
avowed Zionists and a minority of Jews who prefer to exploit the 
subject races tranquilly, and who fear that too blatant assertions 
of Jewish superiority may make the goyim react, but it is a dispute 
over means, not ends, and it is noteworthy that the minority is 
rapidly dwindling as the craven submission of Aryans to even 
such flagrant outrages as the bombing and strafing of the U. S. S. 
Liberty gives assurance that the beasts of burden can always be 
harnessed to work for their masters, no matter how much they 
may be beaten and kicked. 

This virtually perfect cohesion, by the way, must in large 
measure account for the intellectual superiority of which the Jews 
boast and which, I fear, we must concede when we consider the 
race as a whole, although it is denied by many of our people, who 


personally only know Jews who, apart from their undoubted clev- 
erness in making money out of the natives, seem stupid, or who 
ingratiate themselves with the Aryans among whom they have 
chosen to reside by blandly professing participation in our cul- 
ture (and I do not mean that all such professions are necessarily 
hypocritical). But, for all practical purposes, the race is today, as 
Josephus boasted it was in his time, a unit, and it is somehow 
very ably directed in its predatory operations against other races. 
How much of this highly intelligent strategy is instinctive and 
how much is planned by a supreme command, I shall not try to 
determine; the available evidence is conflicting and not conclu- 

The racial solidarity of the Jews, furthermore, includes such 
complete subordination of the individual to the race, whenever 
the welfare of the race is concerned, that it suggests an hyperboli- 
cal comparison with the social organization of certain insects, 
especially some species of ants and bees, in which the individual 
is virtually a tentacle of a large organism, and it also reminds one 
of Roderick Seidenberg's hope, expressed in his Post-Historic Man 
and Anatomy of the Future (Chapel Hill, 1950 & 1961), that all 
human species (except the "administrators," i.e., Jews) can be 
reduced to mindless automata that operate by reflexes without 
thought or consciousness, like cockroaches, for example. These 
comparisons are, of course, extravagant, but may not be entirely 
irrelevant. A most impressive example of this racial solidarity is 
the fact that, as was revealed by a Jew who resided in Germany, J. 
G. Burg (Schuld und Schicksal, Munich, 1962, with photographs of 
corroborating documents), the Zionists, after the election of an 
independent German government under Hitler, tried to incite 
pogroms and large-scale massacres of the Jews in Germany for the 
purpose of facilitating the stampeding of Aryan cattle from Brit- 
ain and the United States to punish the Germans for trying to 


have a country of their own. The Germans refused to be incited 
and the Jewish efforts to procure pogroms were unsuccessful, so 
it was necessary for them to start the desired war in other ways, 
and after that war, to devise the "holocaust" hoax. The remark- 
able thing is that, so far as I know, no Jews anywhere (except 
Burg) seem at all offended by Weizmann's admission that he 
thought the "annihilation of the Jews in Germany" a small price 
to pay for a Jewish seizure of Palestine. This is really remarkable 
in a race so conscious of its solidarity and superiority. It is true, of 
course, that the British and Americans know that their great War 
Criminals, Churchill and Roosevelt, deliberately contrived the 
death of many thousands of Englishmen and Americans to please 
their Jewish masters and get the Crusade Against Western Civili- 
zation under way, and show no resentment of such bloody trea- 
son, but they are Aryans, who have been so cowed that they seem 
to accept their status as an inferior and expendable species. But 
when Jews accept a proposal to massacre large numbers of their 
own people for the benefit of their race, that is significant. 

If we are to be rational, the racial solidarity of the Jews forces 
on us a most humiliating confession of our own inferiority. Our 
impassioned "anti-Semites" depict the Jews as not only vulgar and 
barbarous (i.e., with manners that we so consider), but also as 
treacherous and greedy; but, as a matter of fact, we cannot iden- 
tify with confidence a single Jew who betrayed his race for profit 
or any other consideration, while we know that most Aryans will 
cheerfully betray their race for a few hundred dollars — say, five 
hundred, to allow for high ideals — or even for a pat on the head 
and a prospect of future profit. The number of Aryans who have 
even recognized the common interest of their race, although they 
know it to be a small and hated minority among the prolific and 
invidious races who form the bulk of the planet's population, is 
extremely small. One exception to the rule was Commander 


Josiah Tattnall of the U.S. Navy, who, in 1859, led the American 
squadron in China to the assistance of the British gunboats that 
were trying to force a passage of the Chinese forts at the mouth 
of the Pei-ho, quoting the once proverbial expression, "Blood is 
thicker than water." It is significant that, if I have been correctly 
informed, his statue in the U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis has 
been removed, since he was so wicked as to think that Aryans are 
fit to live. Americans, it seems, have been so well trained by the 
Jews that they now accept a status as taxpaying animals that exist 
so that all the vermin in the world can eat and excrete on them. It 
is noteworthy that during the "war" in Vietnam, when packs of 
febrile and neurotic young Americans (incited and led, of course, 
by Jewish agitators) formed mobs to scream protests, they howled 
about the suffering of the sweet Mongoloid Vietnamese, but 
never mentioned the young Americans who had been sent into 
that racial cesspool to be killed or infected with Oriental diseases 
for the purpose of further advertising the degradation and impo- 
tence of their nation and of providing a pretext for sucking more 
blood from the imbecile taxpayers. The death of American sol- 
diers was not even considered by the screeching agitators, evi- 
dently on the assumption that that was what Americans were for, 
and, as a matter of fact, an American lieutenant, a commissioned 
officer in the Army, was later convicted and imprisoned because 
he had killed some Vietnamese, instead of letting himself be 
killed by them, as an Aryan should. And when it was thought 
that the United States had been sufficiently disgraced and made 
contemptible in the eyes of all its enemies, a "peace" was 
arranged by one of the Jewish masters; the stupid American tax- 
payers were further afflicted with "reparations" to compensate 
their enemies, and several hundred young American soldiers, 
prisoners of the enemy, were gladly abandoned to be kept in 
cages or tortured to death, as might most please their captors. 


They were just Aryan curs, after all, and therefore obviously 
expendable. To such self-imposed debasement our race has come, 
and it is not, perhaps, remarkable that Aryans employed by the 
Jews in the press and television gladly cooperate in the offensive 
against their own nation and race in return for the salary paid 
them and the approval of their masters. 

In sharp and terrible contrast to our race's suicidal mania, 
the Jews could legitimately boast that no Jew has ever knowingly 
betrayed his race. It is true that they do not avail themselves of 
that proof of superiority, but instead wail about betrayals, but 
that so corresponds to the standard and inveterate Jewish tech- 
nique of making themselves seem "persecuted" that one is 
inclined to question every instance of supposed "betrayal" that 
they adduce. 

One hears most often Jewish execration of Pfefferkorn, the 
Jew who, having had himself sprinkled with the Christians' 
magic water, became a Dominican and disclosed to the goyim 
some of the contents of the Babylonian Talmud. No one can now 
ascertain what was in Pfefferkorn's mind, but if we view him his- 
torically, it is obvious that he, knowingly or unwittingly, played a 
very important and possibly crucial role in inciting the great reli- 
gious schism in Europe in the early Sixteenth Century and thus 
performed a great service for his compatriots, inciting the goyim 
to butcher one another for centuries and to devastate their own 
countries, to the great profit, as well as the spiritual satisfaction, 
of the Jews then residing in Europe. 

The Jews speak bitterly of Henry Klein, a Jewish attorney 
who, during the premature Jewish Terror in the United States in 
1944, did not betray his American clients, as a good Jewish lawyer 
should, but defended them before the Jewish Federal judge who 
had been appointed by our great War Criminal to destroy them 



and thus terrorize all American curs who dared not to lick the 
boots of their masters. The Jews so persecuted Klein that he 
denounced the Zionists (e.g., in his booklet, Zionism Rules the 
World, 2 which he had printed at his own expense in 1955) before 
he was hounded to suicide. But, nota bene, he denounced the 
Zionists, not his own race, and it is only reasonable to believe that 
he, however mistakenly, believed that he was protecting his com- 
patriots in the United States, not harming them. It must be 
remembered that even in 1944, the Americans were not so pros- 
trate and cowed as they now are. In 1939-40, for example, it was 
possible for an American, Paul Beshers, who had enjoyed a brief 
season of political prominence a few years before, to assure his 
Jewish friends, "If you drive us into a war against Germany, it will 
not be long before Americans are shooting Jews on Michigan 
Avenue [in Chicago] without a hunting license." Some Jews were 
(he says) impressed by that prediction in 1940, and quite a few 
well-informed Americans, including officers in the armed ser- 
vices' intelligence corps, during the war of 1941-45, expected very 
drastic reprisals against the Jews after that war. It is against such a 
background that Klein's supposed "betrayal" of his race must be 

The majority of Jews hate Benjamin Freedman, who quoted 
a few well-known passages in the Talmud and other Jewish writ- 
ings that the lowly goyim should not be permitted to see in his 
books Facts Are Facts and The Hidden Tyranny. ^ Freedman, unlike 
the many Jews who had themselves sprinkled with holy water and 

2. Available from CDL Report, Box 449, Arabi, LA 70032; 

3. Also available from CDL Report. 



worked themselves up to positions of power in the various Chris- 
tian churches during the Middle Ages and in the time of the Ref- 
ormation and Counter-Reformation, incurred the venomous 
hatred of many Jews. When I met him many years ago, he told 
me — I assume truthfully — that when he and his wife were in an 
elevator of the very expensive apartment building in New York 
City in which he then lived, and the very rich Jews who lived in 
the same building entered the same elevator, they would spit all 
over his and his wife's clothing to show their disapproval by a typ- 
ical Jewish gesture. Freedman, however, did not intend to betray 
his race; on the contrary, he was convinced (it seems, mistakenly) 
that he was racially a real Jew, whereas most Jews were Turko- 
Mongolians who had disguised themselves as Jews and cunningly 
come to dominate the Jewish race, which he certainly did not 
intend to depreciate, much less betray. On the contrary, he imag- 
ined that he was, at great self-sacrifice, protecting his own people 
from the reprisals that might someday fall upon them. 

The clearest example of the betrayal of the Jews by a Jew 
would be the famous "Protocols of the Elders of Zion," if, as is 
maintained in some accounts of their publication, that docu- 
ment was sold by a Jew to the Russian intelligence services for a 
fee. The Jews, however, vociferously claim that the "Protocols" are 
a forgery. This allegation was long accepted, on the grounds that 
it was extremely unlikely that Jews would rashly put in writing so 
candid a statement of their purposes, and it was generally 
believed that the document was forged by a white man who had a 
phenomenal knowledge of the Jews and an astounding ability to 
predict what they would do in subsequent decades. Recent exhi- 
bitions of Jewish arrogance and contempt for the Aryan mental- 
ity suggest, however, a reconsideration of the problem. It may be 
doubted whether any man of our race could have so perfectly 
anticipated and described in the last years of the Nineteenth 



Century the policies that the Jews put into effect in the Twenti- 
eth, down to the present time. But however that may be, we can- 
not regard the "Protocols" as proof that a Jew betrayed his own 

Jews often denounce as a "traitor" Benjamin D'Israeli, who, 
in his Coningsby (1844) and many speeches and books down to 
his Endymion (1880), candidly told the British that the only real 
issue was that of race and further told them that all the govern- 
ments of Europe were really controlled by Jews, who operated 
behind the scenes and dictated the policies of the ostensible rul- 
ers, whether monarchs or elected officials. Some of our people, 
including the late Douglas Reed in his posthumous Controversy of 
Zion, think that D'Israeli was trying to warn the British about the 
power and purposes of "Zionists." I do not profess to know what 
was in D'Israeli's mind — I would not presume to guess that, even 
if he had been a member of our race, instead of belonging to a 
race whose mentality is so different from our own that we can 
only make conjectures about its processes — but I observe that he 
could have issued the supposed "warnings" with the assurance 
that the Anglo-Saxons were too stupid to understand them, and 
that his pronouncements on that subject, like his unconventional 
behavior and garish clothing, served so to advertise him that he 
attained political power in Britain, became the first admittedly 
alien Prime Minister of the British Empire and the first undis- 
guised Jew to enter the House of Lords as the Earl of Beacons- 
field. In 1858, Lord Harrington, commenting on the 
international race's parasitic plundering of all nations through 
international finance, control of the press, and revolutionary agi- 
tation, pointed out that Jews acquire "citizenship" in a nation 
only to sabotage it. He was supported by Lord Galloway, who 
remarked that if Jewish subversion of Great Britain were not 
checked, the time might come when a corrupt Prime Minister 



could be bribed to have a tide of British nobility conferred on 
one of the aliens. Ten years later, DTsraeli became the Prime 
Minister of the British Empire, and in 1876, he became the Earl 
of Beaconsfield, while Jews throughout the world snickered at 
another proof that goyim never learn. 

How great was the corrosion of English character in those 
years may be estimated from a single datum. One of the foremost 
British novelists, Louise Ramee ("Ouida"), in her Strathmore 
(1865), casually mentioned in a descriptive passage "the vampires 
of Israel, who, like their forefather and first usurer, Jacob, know 
well how to deal with the famished, and sell us our mess of pot- 
tage at no smaller price than our birthright." No one was per- 
turbed by her passing reference to what everyone knew, but less 
than a century later such a reference by a novelist would have 
been suicidal audacity. Her publishers would have been at once 
driven into bankruptcy; her book, however praiseworthy for its 
literary qualities, would not have been mentioned by any 
reviewer; she would have been defamed in all the newspapers as a 
"Nazi"; and all well-trained English nitwits would have shrunk in 
loathing from the contamination of her presence. The Anglo-Sax- 
ons not only cower before the Jewish Terror, but pride themselves 
on their servitude. 

It is not a mere coincidence that Strathmore was published 
three years before a Jew became the Queen's Prime Minister, thus 
climaxing a prolonged and patient subversion of the upper 
classes by usury, bribes, and the technique of marrying Jewesses 
with large dowries to the sons of avaricious noblemen or mem- 
bers of the landed gentry. 

The Jews complain bitterly of certain members of their tribe 
who published in the United States in the 1930s indiscreetly can- 
did comments on the innate differences between Jews and our 



race. The worst offender was probably Samuel Roth, who, having 
been repeatedly swindled by Jews and told that he must suffer in 
silence for the sake of racial solidarity, published his Jews Must 
Live^ in 1934, writing in "an agony of spirit" to describe conduct 
and habits that were, in any case, apparent to any careful observer 
of what another Jew boastfully called the "nation within" the 
United States. I do not question Roth's sincerity, but did his 
comment on "the hideous swamp the Jews have made of Western 
Civilization" impair the power of the ubiquitous tribe from 
which he defected? The answer is obvious. Two years before Roth 
wrote, the German people, on whom the Jews had fed for centu- 
ries before D' Israeli specifically noted that, whatever the stupid 
Germans might imagine, their nation was really governed by Jew- 
ish financiers, made a courageous effort to acquire control of 
their own country and become an independent nation. The 
result we all know. The Jews, through their control of the press 
and of numerous hirelings, of whom Winston Churchill and 
Franklin Roosevelt are merely the most loathsome specimens, 
stampeded great hordes of crazed Aryans from Britain, France, 
and the United States into Germany to commit outrages that for- 
ever forfeited their claim to be civilized men, thus giving to the 
world an unforgettable lesson of what happens to Aryan dogs 
who dare to disobey their divinely-appointed masters. Does any- 
one wonder that the Jews feel a sovereign contempt for cattle that 
are so easily herded? And can a rational observer fail to ask 
whether that contempt is not amply justified, and whether the 
Suicide of the West is not proof of a biological inferiority in our 

4. Available from Catholic Books, Box 350333, Ft Lauderdale FL 33335 






In the early years of our era, the Jews were then (as now) 
busy selling religion and revolution to the natives, and that is 
undoubtedly what the Emperor Claudius meant in 41 A.D. 
when, in his letter of warning to the Jews in Egypt (preserved in a 
papyrus now in the British Museum, R Lond. 1912), he described 
them as "the fomenters of a universal plague." 

Claudius' phrase is the best description of the biologically 
innate nature of Jews that I have seen. I hope this does not startle 
you; if it does, I recommend a little objective observation of Jews 
engaged in collective action. 

The publication of these papyri in the British Museum 
stopped with Volume V, just short of the group of papyri, begin- 
ning with #1912, that deal with Jews and Christians in Egypt. 
These, however, were edited in a separate volume by H. Idris Bell, 
London, 1924, which can be found under his name in any good 
library. Why the official series stopped where it did (and has 
never been continued), I do not know. One suspects there was a 
Jew in the woodpile. 

P. Lond. 1912 is a long papyrus fragment excellently pre- 
served. It is a private copy of an edict by Claudius that was posted 
in public places in Alexandria in 41 A.D. and is complete. It is in 
Greek, not Latin, because in Egypt every literate person (Greeks, 
Jews, Egyptians, and the comparatively few Romans who were 
there as governors and military commanders) knew Greek, 
whereas only the Roman officials knew Latin at all. Bell believes 
that our Greek text was translated from Claudius's Latin, but I 
am certain that the text is what Claudius himself dictated to a 
secretary in Greek. Like every educated Roman of his day, Clau- 



dius spoke and wrote Greek fluently, and furthermore he was 
something of a scholar and wrote his two major historical works 
(now lost) in Greek. This Greek text contains stylistic peculiari- 
ties that are characteristic of Claudius's mentality, but would 
probably have been smoothed away by a translator. 

Claudius, who was born in 10 B.C., was the son of the male 
child with whom Livia was pregnant at the time that Augustus 
married her. If that child was legitimate, it was the son of Livia' s 
first husband and the younger brother of the Emperor Tiberius. 
If the child was illegitimate, as many suspected, Augustus was 
probably the father, but never acknowledged the paternity. Clau- 
dius's mother was the daughter of Mark Antony. Claudius in 
infancy suffered from poliomyelitis or a similar disease that left 
him with a partly paralysed foot, some impediment in his speech, 
and muscles of the face and neck subject to spastic contractions. 
Regarded as unfit for public life, he devoted himself to historical 
and antiquarian studies, becoming both erudite and pedantic. 
He was quite intelligent, but timorous, excitable, and gullible, 
especially toward persons who showed him some attention and 
professed friendship during the first fifty-one years of his life, 
when he was regarded as an awkward and ridiculous political nul- 
lity, the butt of his nephew Caligula's wit. Among those who thus 
acquired his gratitude and confidence were a number of clever 
Jews of great wealth and influence in Rome. Among these was 
Marcus Julius Agrippa (note the purely Roman name; a grandson 
of the Herod who appears in many versions of the Christ story), 
who, when the barbarian mercenaries rioted after the assassina- 
tion of Caligula and, while plundering the palace, found old 
Claudius hiding in a closet and dragged him out to proclaim him 
emperor, by subtle and crafty machinations and bribery managed 
to get Claudius installed and recognized as emperor by the Sen- 
ate. Claudius rewarded him generously, and was always under the 



influence of the prominent Jews in Rome. That is what makes his 
pronouncement so significant. 

Alexandria was, of course, founded by Alexander the Great 
as a Greek city in conquered Egypt, and it became under his 
Greek successors, the Ptolemies, the capital of that country. Its 
position as the only real harbour in Egypt added to its great pros- 
perity, and naturally Jews came streaming in from their colonies 
all over the civilized world. Alexandria became the New York of 
the ancient world, i.e., the largest Jewish city. The Jews took over 
two of the five quarters of the city for their ghettoes, from which 
they unofficially but effectively excluded white people, but natu- 
rally insisted on pushing their way into all the other quarters of 
the city and making themselves obnoxious in their normal ways. 
Jews always betray the countries in which they are feeding on the 
natives, so naturally, when Augustus attacked Egypt, the Jews nat- 
urally betrayed the Greeks, who remained loyal to Cleopatra, the 
last of the Ptolemies. Augustus punished the Greeks for their loy- 
alty by depriving them of their local self-government, and 
rewarded the Jews for their treason with many special privileges, 
including the right to have a kind of Jewish government of their 

The Jews, now riding high, naturally pushed the Greeks 
around more than ever, thrusting themselves into the gymnasia 
and other Greek institutions that were traditionally for Greeks 
only and inciting riots whenever they were so "persecuted" that 
the Greeks did not recognize them as a vastly superior race. The 
result was an endless series of civil disturbances that the Romans 
were powerless to prevent because no government dared to 
revoke Augustus's grant of special privileges to the Jews. In the 
second year after Claudius became emperor, there was another 
one of the perennial riots in Alexandria that became virtual civil 



wars in the city, which was the most populous in the ancient 

The Greeks of Alexandria despatched an embassy of their 
leading citizens to Claudius to request restoration of their local 
government and explain the cause of the riots, and the Jews, of 
course, sent an embassy of their own to snivel and whine about 
being "persecuted" by the wicked goyim. 

The edict of Claudius of which the papyrus is a copy is 
addressed to the Greeks of Alexandria and announces his deci- 
sion concerning the requests made by their envoys. 

There is (1) a preamble by the Roman prefect who had cop- 
ies of the edict displayed in public places, (2) a section listing the 
titles of Claudius and the names of the Greek envoys, (3) permis- 
sion to hold public celebrations of Claudius's birthday and to 
erect statues in his honor, etc., (4) confirmation of the Greeks' 
right to have a Greek educational system qualifying them for 
Alexandrian citizenship, (5) granting requested changes in the 
appointments to certain temple offices and other minor offices, 
(6) a promise to take under advisement the Greeks' request for a 
restoration of their local government (Claudius never granted 
that: the Jews would have had fits if so "persecuted"), and, (7) a 
pronouncement about the recent riots and a warning against rep- 
etition of them (which, so far as we know, kept the peace for 
eleven years). It is this last section which is of interest to us. 

Here is the text of the concluding part of the edict. I repro- 
duce it from N. R Charlesworth's Documents Illustrating the Reigns 
of Claudius and Nero (Oxford, 1936). The text is here presented 
with modern capitalization, punctuation, and separation of 
words; anyone who knows Greek should be able to read it off- 




ovk €x w Ae'yav, on Se cm rdtv rrpo e\xov £e/?aord)y ovk elx €T€ 
aa<f>ujs otSare. Katvov St) irpdyparos vvv irpujrov KarafiaWoficvov 
OTTep ao'rjXov ft (tvvolocl rfj no X ec kcll tol$ ifiois 7rpa.ypsi.Gt, cyp ai/ra 
AipuAtuj 'Ptjktw $ta(jK€ipao6ai kolI hrjXwaai p.01 ci re koX avvia- 
rauQat, t-tjv apxrjv Set, tov re rpoTrov, ciircp apa Gwdyciv Scot, KaB* 
ov ycvrjacrai rovro. Yrjs Se irpo? 'IouSatous* Tapa;^? xal OTaaeai?, 
juaAAoi/ h\ cl ^p?) to aAtjOes e irrtLV, toO ttoXc{lov, Trorcpot picv atrial 
Karcarr^aav t KaiTrep it; avriKaracrrdcrcco? TroXAd r&v vpLcrlpoiv 
7Tpea/3ewF <J>iXotl(jl7]64vtwv ko.1 pLdXiora Aiowalov rov Qdcuvos, 
op.ios ovk ifiovXrjOrjv aKpij5w$ c£eXey£ai } ra/ue voficvos ijxavrw Kara 
rwv rrdXtv dp^aficvtnv opyrjv d/i,€Tap.e A17 rov * a/rrAtjJs St TTpooayopcvw 
otl, av fifj KaraTravcrr)T€ ttjv 6X£9piov opyrjv rav-n]v ko.t oAAtJAcov 
avOdhiov, cKfiiaaO^oopLaL Sei^at olov coriv rjytfxwv <j>iXdvdpwnos els 
dpyrjv hiKaiav fj.cTafttj3Xr)pcvo$. Atorrcp cri /cat vw oiafiaprvpopju. 
u'o. 'AAtfavSpetj jxcy rrpacws xal ^cXavSpdjirw? Trpoatjfcpwvrac 
'lovhalots rols rrjv avrrjv rroXiv ck ttoXXwu xpovcav otVouat /cat 
pn]hkv rcuv rrpos 6pT]<jKeiav avrois vevopuopLcvwv rov Ocov Au/xcu- 
vajvrat, aAAa ediariy auTOiJ? rot? cdcoiv xprjodai of? /rat em tou #eou 
^cjjaarov, drrcp koI cyw ^idKovaas dji^orcpcjov c&cfiauooa' Kai 
'Iot/Satois 1 Se aiTixpvs k(Acvoj {irjhcv ttXcloj iLv TTporcpov ccr^a^ 
7T€pi€pyd^€o6aL p,r)he wavcp iv ovol ttoXcgiv KaTOiKoi/vTay Suo 
Trpcafieias it<7TCfj,7Tctv tov Xoittov, u {jltj irporcpov ttotc errpdj^Tj, 
pL7]be iTTttu-TTaUiv yvp.vaaiap)(LKQls rj Koap.T)TLKoZ<; nycDcrt, #cap7rot;- 
p.€vov$ fxtv ra otVela a77oAauo^Tas Se eV aAAorpta TroAei Treptoyortas 1 
d<j)66vwv dyad&V) ja^St eVayecr^at ^ TrpouU^Bai d~6 Hvpias rj 
AlyvTTTOV KaraTrXiovras 'lovhaiovs, i£ ov pLCLLOvas irrrovoCas ai>a.y- 
KaaOrjOOpai Xafifidveiv €i Se p.f] 3 Trdvra rpotrov avrovs crrcfeAeiJ- 
aofiai Ka6a7T€p Koivijv riva rfjs otVotffteV^? ivoov c^eyttpovras . 
'Eav toutoj^ d.7iouTdvT€S dfjuf>OT€poi fizra irpaonp-os teal <j>i\av- 
Gpu>7iLas tt]$ rtpos dX\-r']Xovs £fjv iOeX-qcrqre, /cat cycb npovoiav ttj? 
TToXecus Troijao/xat rrjv dvwrdrw KaOdrrep €K irpoyovojv otVft'a? 17/itv 
v7rapxpvoip . Bap^tAAuj T(jj e*/xa» (ralp(p fiaprvpco act 7Tpdvotav 
u/^ajv 7rap' «p,ot 7Toiov{j.€vw, 09 /cat jw 7ra<77) ^tAort^ua ffepi roi' 
dycDra rov u7rcp v/xcDp' K€xp^rai t /cat Tifttpiw KXavSup 'Apx^ca/ 
toj tjLU? tratptp. v EppO)cr0€. Pap. Lond, 1912, II. 14-108, 



The original papyrus (with which I compared this text years 
ago, so I can guarantee the accuracy of this transcription) is in 
majuscules without separation of words and has other graphic 
peculiarities which might trouble anyone who has not worked 
with Greek papyri. The section about the riots, which I am going 
to translate, begins in the sixth line. 

This must have been translated into English at least once, 
but I do not know where such a translation has been published, 
so, to save time, I will translate here. Words within parentheses 
are my explanatory additions. If you want a version to compare 
with mine, I think it likely that this papyrus may have been 
included in the two or three volumes of "Select Papyri" in the 
Loeb series, which I do not have at hand. (If this one is not 
included in what purports to be a selection of the more interest- 
ing papyri, that fact will be significant in itself.) I shall try to make 
the English reflect a little of Claudius's peculiar style: 

As for who were responsible for the outbreak and insurrection, 
or rather, if we must designate it correctly, for the wars against the 
Jews, although your envoys and especially Dionysius son of Theon dis- 
tinguished themselves in argument when confronted with their (Jew- 
ish) adversaries, I nevertheless decided not to investigate the matter 
thoroughly, and I entered in the ledgers of my mind a ruthless indig- 
nation against whichever people recommences hostilities; I now 
emphatically give warning that if the two peoples do not desist from 
their disastrous and contumacious hatred of one another, I shall be 
compelled to show what a benevolent ruler can be when he is roused 
to righteous anger. Therefore, I now most solemnly conjure the Alex- 
andrians to behave with forbearance and kindness toward the Jews 
who have for a long time lived in the same city, and not to obstruct 
any of their customary rites in the cult of their god, but to permit 
them to observe the customs they followed in the time of the Divine 
Augustus, which I now sanction, after hearing both sides of the case. 
On the other hand, I now order the Jews not to agitate for more priv- 
ileges than those they have long enjoyed, and not again to have the 



unprecedented insolence of sending out their own ambassadors as 
though they were living in a separate state, and furthermore (I order 
them) not to force their way into the games and contests held by the 
gymnasiarchs and cosmetae (officers who presided over the physical 
and intellectual education of Greek youths and held exhibitions that 
were open only to citizens of Alexandria) while they (the Jews) reap 
the profits of their own special privileges 5 and, living in a city that is 
not their own, enjoy all the bountiful advantages of that city; further- 
more (I order the Jews) not to import or bring in (i.e., into Alexan- 
dria) by ship Jews from Asia Minor or Egypt (from which Alexandria 
was administratively separated), a procedure which must necessarily 
excite in me the gravest suspicions. Otherwise (i.e., if the Jews do not 
obey), I will by all means take vengeance on them as being the 
fomenters of what is a universal plague throughout the civilized 

If both peoples, desisting from these practices, are willing to live 
together with tolerance and kindness toward one another, I, for my 
part, will show the utmost concern for the prosperity of the city (Alex- 
andria) as being one joined to us in friendship from the time of our 

I assure you that my friend, (Tiberius Claudius) Barbillus (one of 
the six Roman citizens among the twelve envoys from Alexandria), 
has always shown solicitude for your welfare whenever he appeared 
before me, and he now championed your cause with great zeal and 
distinction, and the same goes for my friend, Tiberius Claudius 
Archibius (another one of the envoys). Farewell. 

Alexandrian citizens paid heavy local taxes and additional taxes were 
levied on residents (including Egyptian natives) who were not citizens, 
but, as we now learn from a papyrus in Berlin (#8877), one of the priv- 
ileges of which the Jews boasted was exemption from all such taxes. 
Naturally, they did not want to become citizens of the city! 



The translation could be polished a bit, but it will show the 
meaning. The sentence in which we are particularly interested, 
delineated in detail, reads: 

But if (they do) not, I shall in every way wreck vengeance 
upon them inasmuch as (=on the grounds that) they are persons 
who foment (=incite, propagate) a universal (=ubiquitous, found 
everywhere) disease (=pestilence, plague) of the oecumene (i.e., the 
settled and inhabited world, as distinct from jungles, steppes, and 

You will have noticed that Jews were behaving normally in 
Alexandria, not only whining about being "persecuted" because 
of their Love of God while pushing their way into every place 
where the despised goyim hope to have a little privacy from them, 
but even illegally importing fellow parasites to prey on the white 
cattle, just as the Jews are constantly importing thousands of 
their congeners into the United States, not only across the border 
from Canada, but by ships that land thousands of the dear crea- 
tures at Red Hook on Long Island, whence they are carried by 
limousine to the New Jerusalem commonly called New York City, 
in open defiance of the immigration officers, who know about it 
but dare not intervene. 




The few Aryans who dare to criticize the Jews are wont to 
wax indignant over the methods by which the aliens acquire con- 
trol, which, to be sure, are immoral according to our own 
accepted standards of civil behavior within one of our own societ- 
ies. But let us be fair and, what is more important, objective. 

The survival of the fittest always has been, and always will 
be, the immutable law of life on this planet. Mammals that do 
not depend on sheer fecundity to preserve their kind (e.g., rab- 
bits, lemmings) have but two resources in themselves: strength 
and stealth, the latter compensating for deficiencies in the 
former. Even the male lion, whom we have taken as the symbol of 
courage, depends for much of his sustenance on prey that his 
females take by leaping from ambush. The elephant is a noble 
animal and a symbol of strength, but he falls prey to the cunning 
of weaker species, such as tigers and men. 

It is a peculiarity of our race — and one that the Jews regard 
as especially childish and fatuous — that we have an ideal of vic- 
tory obtained only in a fair fight. Our racial mentality is domi- 
nated by the sentiment that finds expression in our cherished 
picture of Mediaeval knights, equally matched, meeting in the 
lists or in the storied adventures of King Arthur's Round Table. 
But even in our romances, the fair fight is an ideal only as 
between individuals of our own race, who observe our racial stan- 
dards of personal honor; and in practice our race has accepted 
modifications of it that seem odd to us today: for example, in the 
family feuds of Iceland it was considered proper to kill a man by 
striking from ambush, provided that one boasted of the deed and 
thus averted an imputation of cowardice by indicating to the vic- 
tim's kinsfolk on whom they should revenge his death. 



In war, even between nations of our race, our ideal of a "fair 
fight" is disregarded as irrelevant, unless we hold that "fairness" 
includes not only physical courage, but also intelligent fore- 
thought and planning, which can be described as cunning. We 
admire strategy as much as courage. In the proverbial story of the 
Trojan Horse, we do not reprehend the deception practiced by 
Sinon, but rather the superstition and credulity of the Trojans, 
who fell victim to the Greeks' ruse; and while we may feel com- 
passion for certain individual Trojans who suffered for their peo- 
ple's folly, we feel no pity for that people as a whole, unless we 
attribute their gullibility to a force outside themselves and think 
that their minds were darkened by the supernatural power of 
some god or gods. All the great generals of history have achieved 
their victories, not by the indispensable courage of their men, but 
by strategy, i.e., their ability to outwit their enemies by a form of 
deception. We even have an aphorism that affirms that "all is fair 
in war," and we take it for granted that the physically weaker 
party must rely on superior cunning, if it is not to succumb. 
When Europeans first settled in the Western Hemisphere, they 
were few in number — so few that even their superiority in arma- 
ment and discipline over the aborigines did not cancel their 
numerical weakness — and they did not hesitate to use some 
Indian tribes to defeat and destroy others, often exciting and 
always profiting from the internal dissensions of a race whose 
continent they intended to take from them. Such expedient 
deception we have always considered justified as a weapon of 
physical weakness against physical strength. 6 

Now the Jews have always been physically (i.e., numerically) 
a weaker people. Wherever they have lodged themselves, they 
have been a small minority among the goyim. Even in the United 
States today, where the largest fraction of their race now resides, 
reasonable estimates of their number do not exceed twenty mil- 



lions. Estimates must necessarily be uncertain, for when the cen- 
sus was taken ten years ago, the Jews forbade the "American" 
government to ascertain the number of Jews who openly profess 
their alien status by publicly practicing their religion. The Jews' 
own reports of their numbers in religious terms are, as Mark 
Twain observed long ago, utterly preposterous, although some 
persons charitably claim that the figures are obtained by counting 
only male heads of households and reporting these as a total pop- 
ulation, it being the fault of the stupid goyim that they assume 
that the statistics were compiled in the same terms as their own, 
which include women, children, and dependents in the total. In 
any event, even an accurate count of the aliens who attend syna- 
gogues would be inconclusive, since one would still have to guess 
the number of Marranos. A large part of the Jewish force in every 
country consists of Marranos, Jews who, using the chameleon- 
like ability of their species, effectively disguise themselves. I have 

It is true that the absolute rule is modified by disapproval of treach- 
ery, i.e., the violation of an explicit or implied agreement between per- 
sons who presumably recognize and accept our standards of honor, 
but even here the distinction is fluid. Although Americans resent 
being reminded of it, their history as an independent nation begins 
with the act of treachery by which they (as a whole, regardless of the 
intentions of certain individuals) induced General Burgoyne and his 
army to surrender by solemnly pledging that the defeated army could 
return to Britain, and then violated that agreement by confining the 
cozened troops in conditions of such hardship and severity that many 
of them, even among the officers, perished before the end of the war. 
For such treachery no apology can be offered in terms of the stan- 
dards of our race (although it would have been merely normal for 
most other races), but gentlemen among the Americans probably 
salved their consciences by telling themselves that they, the rebels, 
were weak while Great Britain was strong. The disgraceful episode, 
however, should check any tendency of Americans to a Narcissistic 
doting on their own virtues. 



often glanced through the lists of births reported by the Jews in 
their own Detroit Jewish News, and I could not but notice that on 
many days there was no name that betrayed the race of the child. 
The personal names of the parents and children were all "Chris- 
tian" names, with some preference for names that are tradition- 
ally Scottish, and the family names all suggested British, French, 
or sometimes Slavic, ancestry. Those instances of the Jews' mas- 
querading under assumed names, it should be remembered, are 
all of Jews who, by inserting such announcements in their own 
newspapers, confess their race. Many Marranos eschew such 
indiscretion, and some are so adept at disguise that their acquain- 
tances and associates are astonished when some accident or indis- 
cretion discloses the race of a person who seemed to be an 
American, Englishman, South African, German, Frenchman, or 
other member of our own race. But even when we make every 
allowance for the Jews' mastery of disguise, we must admit that 
they are still a minority in the United States, where they are 
surely outnumbered by the Aryans, who are probably still an 
absolute majority in their own country and outnumber the total 
of all the aliens in their midst, Jews, Congoids, mulattoes, mesti- 
zos, Mongolians, and the like. If the feeble-minded Aryans, 
instead of subsidizing the prodigious breeding and proliferation 
of their domestic enemies and even importing hordes of others 
from Vietnam, Haiti, and elsewhere as "refugees" for the eventual 
extermination of the Aryans' own children, were sufficiently 
intelligent and resolute, they would still have the power to expel 
or otherwise eliminate all of their alien parasites, among which 
the Jews are a small, though prepollent, minority. 

Throughout history, the Jews have everywhere been a minor- 
ity in the countries into which they have intruded themselves, 
and they have necessarily employed the weapons of the physically 
weak against the physically strong. The Jews have never captured a 



territory by open warfare and invasion: they have never been suf- 
ficiently numerous and strong to attempt an open conquest, even 
if they had been so temerarious as to waste their own lives to 
attain what they could more easily and safely attain by deceit. 

It is true that the Jews' myths include two claims of open 
conquest, but both of these are indubitably fictitious. 

One of those stories is well known, since it is found in the 
collection of Jewish tales commonly called the "Old Testament" 
by our people. According to that myth, the Jews (with the help of 
their tribal deity) openly invaded the land of Canaan, ruthlessly 
butchered all the inhabitants and even the inhabitants' domestic 
animals, and then appropriated the country they had made a 
bloody desert. The tale, even when divested of such nonsense as a 
claim that the Jews' god stopped the sun and moon, luminous 
disks that were floating in the atmosphere at an altitude of about 
50,000 feet, and held them stationary for a time to facilitate the 
rapine, is utterly incredible and no reputable historian, not even 
among those who profess to be Christians, pretends to believe it. 
The tale of armed conquest is intrinsically so incredible that 
Philo Judaeus, one of the ablest of the Jews' apologists and propa- 
gandists, who, in the early years of the First Century, tried to con- 
vince intelligent Greeks and Romans that the Jews were not a 
menace to civilization, had to admit (Hypoth. 6.5-8) that the story 
was preposterous and that what must have happened was that the 
Canaanites voluntarily permitted the Jews to penetrate their 
country peacefully and set up synagogues and the rest of the Jew- 
ish racial organization, after which the Jews, of course, took over. 
Philo candidly admits that when the Jews peacefully penetrate a 
country to despoil it, they, in their own minds, naturally regard 
the inhabitants as enemies, but he seems to hesitate between 
alternative explanations of the Canaanites' suicidal folly in per- 
mitting the Jewish immigration: the stupid Canaanites were 



either impressed by the holiness and superiority of their covert 
invaders or had their minds befuddled by the Jews' god. 

It is true that the Jews at some time obtained control of the 
territory that was thereafter known as Judaea, but there is no way 
of determining what part of the population was composed of 
racial Jews as distinct from the subjugated and mongrelized 
descendants of the original inhabitants, who, despite the Jews' 
boasts, were not exterminated in war. It is possible, of course, 
that some nucleus of truth may underlie the Jews' story that they 
captured city after city of the Canaanites, butchered all the men, 
butchered all the women, butchered all the children, butchered 
all the oxen, butchered all the sheep, butchered all the donkeys, 
and then relaxed in blissful contemplation of their own holiness 
(e.g., Jos. 6.21). There is archaeological evidence of the destruc- 
tion of cities by war as well as by earthquakes in or near the time 
of the supposed conquest, but from what we know of the Jews' 
racial habits, we may guess that after their "peaceful" immigra- 
tion, they promptly started subversion and civil wars and were 
soon able to use one army of stupid goyim against another army of 
stupid goyim, so that the natives slew one another and destroyed 
themselves, while the Jews egged on the contestants and rubbed 
their hands gleefully together, much as recently they stampeded 
their British and American cattle into Germany to facilitate their 
pious appropriation of the earth that their tribal god contracted 
to give them. 

The second story of armed conquest comes from another 
Jewish propagandist, Josephus, who was a little younger than 
Philo, and whose story (Cont. Af>. 1.75-94, 224) of a conquest of 
Egypt by the Hyksos long imposed on historians who did not 
take into account the Jews' racial genius for forgery and decep- 
tion, which is now so vividly illustrated by such hoaxes as "Anne 
Frank's Diary" and the nonsense about the "six millions" of 



God's Race that the Germans supposedly killed before the six 
million crawled into the United States and other Western 
nations. Whether Josephus forged the passage that he claims to 
quote from Manetho or utilized the work of some earlier Jew is 
uncertain; he relies heavily on the Jewish forgers of earlier centu- 
ries, especially the ones who assumed Greek names, much as Jews 
now masquerade under such names as Ashley Montagu, Lyle Stu- 
art, and Craig Schiller, so that Josephus can pretend that they 
were Aryans who testified to the vast superiority of God's Race. 
What is certain is that there was no conquest of Egypt by the 

It is now known (see Cambridge Ancient History, Vol. II, 1, pp. 
54-64, 288-296; and especially the definitive work on this subject, 
The Hyksos, by John Van Seters, Yale University Press, 1966) that 
the "Hyksos" were peoples, probably of several different tribes 
that spoke Semitic languages, whom the Egyptians indiscrimi- 
nately described as "Asiatics," and who infiltrated Egypt by grad- 
ual immigration across the Sinai peninsula, and probably never 
were numerous enough to form a very large fraction of the popu- 
lation; they were clever enough, however, to spread sedition and 
incite civil wars until they attained a rule over the entire nation, 
placing as governors in each district tributaries and stooges, many 
of whom were certainly or probably native Egyptian traitors, and 
using an uncertain proportion of Egyptians in the troops by 
which they maintained their dominion for almost two centuries. 
An Egyptian revolt finally succeeded in overthrowing the alien 
rulers and expelling many of them (for we may be sure that some 
of the aliens managed to blend themselves into the native popula- 
tion and escape notice). But during their control of Egypt, the 
immigrants incited massacres of the upper classes and promoted 
the mongrelization that the stupid Egyptians had themselves 
begun by importing black slaves from the south, and they left the 



nation genetically impoverished by a great infusion of both black 
and Semitic blood, from which Egypt never recovered. 

There are some indications that the "Asiatic" immigrants 
came from the regions that are now Syria and Palestine, and the 
methods they employed to ruin Egypt make us consider seriously 
Josephus's claim that they were Jews and that when they conde- 
scended to leave Egypt, they built Jerusalem as the capital of the 
region they then occupied. Unfortunately, there is no evidence 
(other than the remarkable similarity of methods) to confirm or 
refute a conjecture that the "Hyksos" were organized and directed 
by Jews. In the past century, before the Jews' habitual duplicity 
and mendacity were generally recognized by historians, Jose- 
phus's story was rejected because the enemy aliens brought with 
them into Egypt a god named Set (Seth), whom they regarded as 
the enemy of the Egyptian gods, although they also talked about 
religious toleration when it suited their purposes in keeping their 
stupid subjects bemused. They evidently proselytized for their 
patron deity so effectively that he remained in the huge crowd of 
Egyptian gods after the end of their rule, although he was then 
most commonly represented as the diabolic assassin of Osiris and 
other native deities. 

So long as it was supposed that the Jews were uniquely 
devoted to a tribal god whom they called Yahweh or Ya'o (who is 
designated in the "Old Testament" by a wide variety of names 
that have been concealed by the translators, who, beginning with 
the Septuagint, use a word meaning 'Lord' to translate a number 
of different names), it was thought axiomatic that the worship- 
pers of Set could not be the holy Jews; but it is now known that 
the Jewish colony at Elephantine, which was regarded as perfectly 
orthodox in Jerusalem, had five gods in a pantheon of which Ya'o 
was merely the chief, and that the Jews worked any convenient 
religious racket, for example, claiming in Egypt that the Egyptian 



god Osiris, the greatest of all gods, had inspired Moses and the 
"prophets of Israel" and had chosen the Jews as his special pets. 
(A translation of the late papyrus, which dates from about 100 
B.C., may most conveniently be found in E. A. Wallis Budge's 
Egyptian Magic, London, 1901 (= New York, 1971), p. 176, with a 
reference to the publication of the original.) There is, further- 
more, the distinct possibility — some Egyptologists would say cer- 
tainty — that Set was originally a name or epithet of an Egyptian 
god and was applied by the cunning invaders to their own deity 
to deceive the natives. (The name may be older than the "Hyk- 
sos," and if it was Egyptian in origin, it becomes less remarkable 
that after the dominion of the execrated "Hyksos" had been bro- 
ken, Set, despite his generally evil reputation, found votaries 
among the Egyptians, including some Egyptian kings.) So, in the 
present state of knowledge, we must leave it an open question 
whether or not the enemy immigrants into Egypt were led by 
Jews; if they were, the Jews were at work as early as c. 1760 B.C.; if 
not, we have no certain historical trace of the race before more 
than a thousand years later. 






The origin of the Jews as a race is unknown, but there are 
indications that they early began to exploit the superstitions of 
the populations on which they fastened themselves. The Jews 
have a tale that their ancestor, named Abraham, came from Ur in 
Sumeria (with mortgages on half the Sumerians' real estate in his 
pocket?), and some scholars, not highly regarded today, have sug- 
gested that some of the Semitic-speaking peoples with whom the 
Sumerians foolishly tried to coexist meddled extensively with the 
Sumerian religion and perhaps even had an influence on the 
white, preAryan civilization of the Indus Valley. There is a firmer 
basis for a conjecture — but only a conjecture, mind you — that 
would explain one of the oddities of the "New Testament," which 
was assembled by a Christian sect that professed a religion that 
was obviously a Judaized form of Zoroastrianism. Everyone has 
noticed the curious detail that in the story about the birth of the 
christ named Jesus which gives the earlier date for the event, the 
nativity is said to have been attended by Zoroastrian priests, who 
were said to have been guided to the spot by an obliging star or 
planet that floated in the atmosphere at an altitude no greater 
than that of cumulus clouds to show them the way. It is possible 
that the Magi, the professional holy men of the religion that was 
spread through the old Persian Empire, were Jews. The Jews have 
a tradition (IV. Reg. 17.6; 18.11) that there were colonies of Israel- 
ites in Media (in the cities, naturally!), and the Magi not only 
claimed to come from Media, but were a closed caste racially and 
(like the Jews) propagated themselves through the female line, 
often obtaining pure offspring by impregnating their sisters or 
mothers. It is now virtually certain that at least the greater part of 



the extant holy books of the supposedly "Aryan" religion, 
although now in an odd dialect of Old Persian, were translated 
from a Semitic language. Diogenes Laertius (L9) mentions in 
passing unnamed Greek geographers who thought that the Magi 
were early Jews, but since those works are now lost, we cannot say 
whether that opinion was based on more than the fact that after 
the fall of the Persian Empire, many of the Magi who peddled 
their cult in other lands were known to be Jews. Herodotus's 
description (III. 7 9) of the Magophonia, the Persian reaction 
when one of the Magi attempted a particularly outrageous fraud, 
sounds very much like a racial outbreak, and How and Wells in 
their commentary on Herodotus (ad 1. 101) suggest that the Magi 
may have been "non- Aryan." From these and a few minor traces 
one can construct an hypothesis that would be highly significant, 
if there were any real proof of it. 

Whatever their origin, there cannot be the slightest doubt 
about the method that the Jews have always regarded as ideal in 
capturing control of a country: it is set forth clearly and explicitly 
in the "Old Testament" (Gen. 47.1-27). The hero of this tale is a 
Jew named Joseph, who is said to have been brought to Egypt as a 
slave, but who cleverly wriggled upward in Egyptian society until 
he was in a position to prey upon the good nature and supersti- 
tions of the Egyptian king, whom he first manipulated to permit 
an influx of Jews, who somehow take possession of the best land 
in the nation; then he uses the king's authority to corner the 
grain market and is thus able to take from the Egyptians all their 
money, all their cattle, and then all their land, so that he has all 
the Egyptians (except the Egyptian priests, with whom he evi- 
dently maintains a prudent but odd alliance) at his mercy, forces 
the famished wretches to sell themselves into slavery, and then 
shrewdly transports groups of the slaves from one end of the 
country to the other, mixing up the population so thoroughly 



that all his victims find themselves among strangers with whom 
they would scarcely dare to concert an effective protest — and the 
Jews, no doubt snickering in private, annexed property and "mul- 
tiplied exceedingly." Joseph used the Egyptian king as a conve- 
nient puppet in this operation, and the tale implies, of course, 
that he enjoyed the cooperation of his tribe's special god, at least 
when he was operating as a fortune-teller on his way up. It is hard 
to say how much fact may underlie the story, which is obviously 
an exposition of the Jews' ideal methods. Some kings of Egypt 
appear to have been feeble-minded, and there is even a record 
that one of them admitted some desert nomads who put up a pit- 
eous plea that their pastures had dried up, but the principal fea- 
tures of the tale more probably reflect Jewish ambitions than 
actual events. However that may be, the tale certainly sketches an 
ideal modus operandi for subjugating the goyim. And the Jews of 
today will surely not have the audacity to claim that that descrip- 
tion of their methods was forged by the secret police of Russia 
under the Czars! 

The Jews claim that the so-called "Protocols of the Elders of 
Zion," which were certainly published as early as 1904 and 
reportedly much earlier in books that were destroyed when the 
Jews seized Russia in 1917, are a "forgery," as, indeed, they may 
be, although they describe in detail and with complete accuracy 
the methods that the Jews have consistently used throughout this 
century to subvert our civilization and destroy our race. But Ary- 
ans who wish to understand the Jewish mentality need not rely 
on that document: they have only to read the "Old Testament" 
with minds that are not immobilized in a fog of superstitious 
awe. There is scarcely a chapter of that pseudo-historical narrative 
that is not highly revealing; for example, there never was a Persian 
king named Ahasuerus (Assuerus; Christian holy men usually 
claim that the name is a "mistake" for Artaxerxes!), but the fic- 



tion about Esther is an inspirational apologue to remind Jewesses 
that while they may find it expedient to marry a male of the lower 
races, they must always remember their duty to manipulate the 
stupid goy to exploit him for the advantage of their Master Race. 




The racial mentality of the Jews is so different from our own 
that we can only draw inferences from observation of their con- 
duct and such of their statements as appear more or less candid 
and worthy of belief (e.g., Maurice Samuel's excellent You Gen- 
tiles J New York, 1924), but we must remember that all forms of 
life instinctively and necessarily make the preservation and 
increase of their species their highest purpose, and if vampire 
bats were capable of reason, they would undoubtedly describe 
their furtive blood-sucking as a righteous exercise and identify as 
diabolically evil the various animals (including men) who in one 
way or another interfere with their noble exercise of their god- 
given right. No species could think of itself as evil. As an ex-Com- 
munist once reminded me, "You must remember that when 
Communists betray a nation or murder innocent people by the 
thousands, they think of themselves as highly moral individuals 
who righteously obey a higher purpose." We may be absolutely 
certain that whatever the Jews do as a race, no matter how vile 
and dastardly it may seem to us who suffer its effects, seems to 
them just and righteous — as indeed it is, if we consider it objec- 
tively in terms of the biological law that makes survival and 
increase the highest law of every species. 8 

The great strength of the Jews and the bond of their racial 
cohesion is their religion, which, in the widest sense, is an unlim- 
ited faith in the absolute superiority of their race, for, as Maurice 
Samuel reminds us, Jewish atheists, who deride a belief in super- 
natural beings, worship the Immortal Jewish People. Beyond this, 

7. Available via HRP, Box 62, Uckfield UK TN22 1ZY; 



we cannot be definite, for doubtless there always has been the 
widest gamut of personal belief, and there is every evidence of 
wild and grotesquely emotional fanaticism among the lower 
classes, as among the rabble that was stirred up by the numerous 
goetae and self-appointed christs in the first century B.C. and the 
First Century of our era with perennial outbreaks of insane vio- 
lence; and many Jewish sects have bizarre notions that must be 

The Aryans are an apparent exception, since everywhere, and most 
conspicuously in the United States, Britain, and now South Africa, 
they are evidently driven by a subconscious death-wish. The species 
may be biologically degenerate or, as the Jews believe, inferior and 
innately stupid, easily herded by its credulity and cupidity. Some opti- 
mists believe that the species could recover its will-to-live and become 
viable again, if it were somehow to escape the control of its Jewish 

Before the political murder of Dr. Verwoerd, many rational Ameri- 
cans saw in South Africa a bright hope for our ill-starred race and 
regarded the Afrikaners as conspicuously intelligent and uncorrupted 
members of it, attributing their prudence to the fact that they were 
separated by only a generation from the pioneers who fought an 
heroic war for independence, and perhaps also to some peculiar integ- 
rity in the Dutch Reformed Church, which appeared to have retained 
some belief in the traditional Christianity of the West at a time when 
churches elsewhere had been bought and converted into mere instru- 
ments of subversion. 

Since the murder of Dr. Verwoerd, which was made to seem fortu- 
itous to persons who do not understand the rule of cui bono!, it has 
become painfully apparent that the Afrikaners are as gullible and 
venal, as befuddled and stultified, as the majority of British and Amer- 
icans; that what we mistakenly attributed to a people was only the 
genius of one man, whose achievements remind one of Philipoemen, 
who led the Greeks in their last stand for independence and to whose 
influence over his decadent and demoralized people Baudelaire paid 
tribute in the memorable lines of his earliest poem: 

Cum te mirantur, ad aha 

se credunt genitos... 



sincerely entertained, as, for example, by the Polish Hasidim, who 
mated their male and female children as soon as they were pubert- 
ate to raise the birthrate to the maximum for the express purpose 
of exhausting God's stock of good Jewish souls as soon as possi- 
ble and thus forcing him to bring the world to an end sooner 
than he intended. But such vagaries among the excitable and irra- 
tional lower classes have really little significance for the racial 
faith. On the other hand, when one turns to the literate Jews, 
one cannot confidently distinguish between what they believe 
and what they deem expedient to profess. Fighting between vari- 
ous Jewish sects has often been violent, bloody, and viciously 
inhuman, but seems not to have been so much over doctrinal dif- 
ferences as over the ambitions of leaders who were ruthlessly slug- 
ging it out for power and wealth and used a religious peculiarity 
to recruit and excite their private armies. And at the limit, we 
have no assurance that the psychological process that we call 
'belief,' and distinguish from hypocrisy and mendacity, occurs in 
the Jewish mind, which may not distinguish between truth and 
falsity in terms of some objective reality, as Aryans do even when 
the reality is merely a product of their imaginations; so far as we 
can tell, indeed, the racial mentality of this alien species may, by a 
psychological process beyond our understanding, think only in 
terms of what is good for the Jewish People, the Divine Race, and 
may only simulate, in discourse with our species, our distinction 
between what is objectively true and what is not, much as we 
train animals by teaching them lessons in terms of their mental 
conformation. 9 

Our minds boggle when we try to understand such state- 
ments as Rabbi Solomon Goldman's "God is absorbed [sic\ in the 
nationalism of Israel... He [God] creates the world [sic] in the 
Hebrew language," Dr. Joseph Kastein's "It was not God who 
willed these people [the Jews]... It was this people [the Jews] who 



willed this God," or any one of a hundred comparable state- 
ments, which seem to us to be the ravings of madness, but are 
only typical of the Jewish mind, which, we must remember, has 
regularly, throughout history, outwitted our race. We, of course, 
often remark that men create God in their own image, thus stat- 
ing a psychological and anthropological truth, and what we mean 
by that statement is that gods do not exist, but are mere figments 
of the imagination, and if a man of our race, having thus 
affirmed his atheism, were then to profess belief in the divinity 
and reality of a god or gods, we should rightly adjudge him 
insane; but it is obvious that the Jewish mind sees no illogic in 
worshipping a god it has knowingly created — in worshipping its 
own image in a mirror. That is insanity — we cannot honestly call 
it anything else in our terminology — but it is the insanity of a 
species that has successfully preyed on all others for millennia 
and is now achieving ownership of the entire earth. 

Or superstitious human beings; Ivor Benson gave an example when 
he wrote: "In North Africa during the last World War, one of our 
tasks was to teach raw Negroes from the jungle to drive three-ton 
trucks. Problem No. 1 was how to explain the gears. Common sense 
produced the answer. Engaging the first gear, the recruits were told, 
harnessed 'the spirit of the elephant' — slow but very strong, just the 
sort of power needed to pull a truck up a steep hill or out of mud. The 
second gear meant 'the spirit of the horse' — a power faster but not as 
strong as that of the elephant. And moving into top gear, it was 'the 
spirit of the antelope' which was harnessed — very fast, but not of 
much use in heavy going. 

"Now, insofar as this mythology worked with these Blacks it can be 
said to have been true, or at any rate to have an element of the truth 
which could not be conveyed to these primitive minds in any other 

"So far as religious myths are concerned, we are, of course, all in the 
condition of those African savages." 



If we are to be both fair and objective, we must bear in mind 
the difference — perhaps an enormous difference — between the 
Jewish mentality and our own. 10 When we consider the Jews' reli- 
gion and describe it in our terms, we attribute to them, explicitly 
or by implication, such hypocrisy as we see in our clergymen 
today, and we are tempted to convict them of a conscious dissim- 
ulation that is odious to us, but we must remember that what 
seems repugnant to us seems good and righteous to their peculiar 

10. There can be no doubt, I think, but that Jews perceive the physical 
world about us quite differently from our perception of it. Since Jews 
communicate with our race in Indo-European languages and in the 
West even use those languages to communicate with each other 
(although probably attaching different meanings to many key words) 
or distort Indo-European languages into special dialects of their own, 
such as their variety of the Greek koine in Antiquity and Ladino and 
Yiddish in more recent times, the vast psychological difference may be 
most clearly seen when one examines Hebrew, a dialect they formed 
from Western Semitic (Phoenician) and impressed with their own 
mentality, since it has many peculiarities not found in other Semitic 
languages. These are set forth by Dr. Thorleif Boman in his Hebrew 
Thought Compared with Greek (Philadelphia, Westminster Press, 1960), 
a work that deserves the most careful study by Aryans. Dr. Boman is a 
Christian and thus obligated himself to find a "moral" value in the 
radically different Jewish mentality, and a comparable study by an 
unprejudiced philologist is greatly to be desired. It is entirely possible 
that the schizophrenic daubs that are peddled to the boobs as "mod- 
ern art" actually correspond to the Jewish perception of reality and 
instinctive hatred of what seems beautiful and noble to us, and should 
not therefore be regarded as merely a means of corrupting our culture 
and displaying contempt for us. 






While it is scarcely possible that Jews do not know they are 
practicing deceit and fraud when they cozen goyim, it is likely that 
they feel much as do members of our race when they shoot deer 
or ducks from blinds, but we can only make precarious guesses 
about their own feelings about their religion. What is clear is its 
usefulness to them in their attacks on other races. 

(1) The religion is the perfect cover for the Jews' racial arro- 
gance. If they claimed on any other grounds to be the Master 
Race and proclaimed that the members of other races were so 
inferior that they were little, if at all, better than swine, the Jews 
would arouse resentment from persons who were unwilling to 
accept that status. But peoples that have emerged from barbar- 
ism, even if still deeply imbued with superstitions themselves, 
have learned to be tolerant of many strange superstitions and 
strange gods and know that there is virtually no limit to what 
votaries can believe. The Jews further disarm resentment by pro- 
fessing to share their status as a Master Race with any 'convert' 
and profess to be eager proselytizers, but have taken the precau- 
tion to impose on proselytes sexual mutilations that alone suffice 
to exclude virile men and grotesquely barbarous taboos that are 
certain to repel every goy except a few females who are so light- 
headed that they will make useful puppets. Their faith in their 
innate superiority is thus shrewdly disguised. 

(2) The religion is a perfect cover for conspiracy. When the 
Jews invade a country, they normally make themselves inconspic- 
uous by infiltrating, a few at a time, and planting a few of their 
number in every city, town, or even village where there is money 
to be made by exploiting the stupid natives. If the scattered 
groups of invaders maintained a close liaison with other mem- 



bers of their race both within and without the nation they are 
attacking and claimed to do so on the basis of any common inter- 
est except religion, they would soon be identified as an alien and 
enemy conspiracy, but by claiming that they have a common 
interest in the worship of some god, they persuade the citizens to 
think of them as merely the votaries of some absurd, but harm- 
lessly foolish, cult, and to overlook the real solidarity of the invad- 

(3) The religion is the perfect means — and this is most 
important — the perfect means of making certain that Jews will 
be persecuted. It must be realized that the Jews success depends on 
their cunning in having themselves "persecuted" 

By perpetually whining that they are a poor, helpless, perse- 
cuted minority, they effectively disguise their real power and their 
success in wrapping their tentacles about their victims, and by 
exciting the pity of soft-hearted and soft-headed goyim, they can 
use those goyim as weapons against the others. 

By establishing a reputation for being persecuted for their 
religion by awfully wicked pagans, they can make it seem that 
they, poor innocents, are suffering for their piety whenever their 
depredations and malevolence have so exasperated their victims 
that the latter try by legislation or violence to free themselves 
from the aliens who are exploiting and oppressing them. 

(4) The religion is perfect camouflage, whether or not it was 
consciously designed for that function. First of all, it enjoins on 
the race practices so barbarous and taboos so absurd and incon- 
venient that members of other races can not believe that any 
rational beings would voluntarily submit themselves to what the 
Jews call their "Law" and therefore assume that the Jews do so 
only from a slavish fear of their capricious and ferocious deity: 
that convinces the goyim that the Jews never dare to disobey the 



supposed will of their god. The Jews have equipped themselves 
with holy books containing specific regulations, such as the so- 
called Ten Commandments, which were, of course, designed 
only to promote solidarity within the race and to apply only to 
members of it, but which can be represented to the stupid "Gen- 
tiles" as governing the Jews' conduct toward them. Thus have the 
Jews enveloped themselves in a reputation for so fearing their 
deity that they obey his written instructions punctiliously, even in 
their relations with other races. So thoroughly have the Jews 
implanted this notion in our people that many Aryans, even if 
they have no religious preconceptions, almost automatically exon- 
erate Jews from charges that are supported by evidence that 
would suffice to convict members of any other race. The testi- 
mony of eye-witnesses who entered the inner sanctum of the tem- 
ple in Jerusalem is rejected out of hand: the pious Jews wouldn't 
have had such a shrine. Strong circumstantial evidence of ritual 
murders is simply disregarded: the God-fearing Jews wouldn't 
indulge in human sacrifice. Every nation on which the Jews have 
fastened themselves since they first appear in history has been 
destroyed by internal subversion and corruption, but no one 
inquires to what extent the alien body lodged within the nation 
was responsible for its disintegration and final doom: the high- 
minded Jews would not harm their hosts. And so it goes. Our 
people have been conditioned automatically to accord to the Jews 
an exemption from the rules of evidence that we observe among 
ourselves. So far as I know, no Aryan charged with theft or mur- 
der has even thought of proving his innocence by asserting he is a 
Christian and producing his Bible as proof that Christians can- 
not steal or murder. No one has ever claimed that the Thirty 
Years' War must be an invention by pagan historians to slander 
Christians, since it is unthinkable that two sects of gentle, loving, 



lamb-like Christians would have so barbarously slaughtered one 

(5) The religion provides a means of penetrating even the 
inmost circles of nations and societies of credulous goyim. A Jew 
has only to claim that he rejects the religion and to have himself 
sprinkled with holy water to make Christians fancy that he has 
been miraculously transformed and is no longer a Jew; non- 
Christians are as gullible, for if a Jew does not observe some of 
the taboos and is seen to eat pork, and if he affects adherence to 
their culture, they accept him as one of themselves. The Jewish 
religion could have been designed to facilitate the planting of 
Marranos in the heart of invaded nations. 

(6) Their reputation as being on intimate terms with super- 
natural beings gives the Jews a great advantage in peddling sor- 
cery and similar hokum in societies marked by a high level of 
ignorance. In the Middle Ages, for example, and even during the 
Renaissance and Reformation, the practice of magic to bilk the 
credulous and to impose even on the rulers of states and learn 
their secrets was almost as useful to the Jews as usury and com- 
mercial fraud in subverting European society. A quick glance at 
any grimoire of the time or at the summary in Arthur E. Waite's 
Book of Ceremonial Magic (London, 1912; New York, 1961) will 
suffice to show that both terminology and practices come from 
Jewish sources, especially the Kabbalah, adapted to impose on 
the goyim. 

(7) Their expertise in superstition has always given the 
"God-people," as the Jews like to call themselves, the ability to 
influence and divert native religions for their own benefit. Since 
such work is done covertly through Marranos and dupes, we can 
only suspect Jewish influence in many religious civil wars without 
being able to prove it. It is, for example, historically certain that 



when Cyrus the Great undertook the conquest of the Babylonian 
Empire, the Jews in that nation operated, as they always do, as 
agents of subversion to weaken and betray their hosts, and that 
after Cyrus captured Babylon without a prolonged siege and 
fighting, he repaid the Jews for their good work, which had 
spared the lives of many of his soldiers, and (as many another 
conqueror was to do later) rewarded them for their betrayal of his 
enemies with special privileges. The Jews, according to their tradi- 
tions, flattered the triumphant goy by calling him their christ, and 
probably rubbed their hands together in glee as they prepared to 
use those privileges to exploit the natives of various regions in the 
expanding Persian Empire, including eventually the native Egyp- 
tians, as we have learned from the Jewish papyri found at Ele- 
phantine. We may reasonably infer that the Jews stealthily 
opened the gates of Babylon to the Persians, so that Cyrus could 
take the strongly walled city without fighting, but we can only 
conjecture what contributions they made to the agitation and 
demoralization of the Babylonians that weakened the Empire 
before the Persians invaded it. The tale of the fall of Babylon in 
the Jews' story-book is, of course, an impressive fiction, probably 
composed almost four hundred years after the event by an author 
who did not even know the name of the last king of Babylon, 
who was Nabonidus (= Nabu-na'id), and evidently a great bene- 
factor of the Jews, 11 who naturally knifed the sucker in the back 
when they had a chance to do so. There may be some truth, how- 
ever, in the Jews' tradition that their hatred of the Babylonians 
was given a religious coloring, and the ranting attributed to Isa- 
iah as well as parts of the tale called "Daniel" may preserve a 
memory of religious agitation carried out by the Jews in Babylon. 
Now one major cause of Nabonidus's difficulties was what 
amounted to a religious civil war in his domains, ostensibly 
between votaries of Sin and the votaries of Marduk, carried out 



with a ferocious fanaticism that seems strange among peoples 
long accustomed to polytheism, even though some of them are 
Semitic by race. And there is evidence that some (we know not 
whether few or many) of the votaries of Marduk were peddling a 
kind of monotheism, claiming that he was the only (good?) god 
and that other gods were merely aspects of him. The Jews, of 
course, never hesitate to promote whatever god is useful to them 
(e.g., Sebazius in Rome and Osiris in Egypt during the second 
century B.C.) in manipulating goyim, and we may suspect that 
they were meddling with the Babylonian religion as well as con- 
tributing in all probability to the economic depression and infla- 
tion in Nabonidus's realm — but, so far as I know, we have no 
proof. The same is true of many later events in history. 

Although a few obscurities remain, the origin and evolution 
of Christianity is now well known, but the subject is far too com- 
plex for full exposition here. We may note, however, one stage in 
that evolution, the Protestant Reformation, which was, if consid- 
ered historically, a terrible calamity that drenched the streets and 
fields of Europe with much of the best blood of our race, impov- 
erishing it genetically, while the Jews watched gleefully and prof- 
ited enormously from both sides and, with the fragmentation of 
Protestantism, all sides. Now many causes contributed to that 

11. It is virtually certain that Nabonidus gave the Jews possession of the 
strategic oases that controlled trade routes to southern Arabia (Arabia 
Felix), which were still in Jewish hands in the time of Mahomet and 
long thereafter; see, e.g., Chapter V of Professor H. W. F. Saggs' The 
Greatness That Was Babylon (New York, 1962; 1968). Even after the 
Persian conquest, Babylon continued to swarm with Jews, and, in the 
time of the Roman Empire, was the capital of their international 
nation and the residence of their chief (Resh-galutha), who may have 
directed the great Jewish Conspiracy of 117. 



disaster, but if we try to identify one single incident that triggered 
the explosion, we must fix on the cleverness of the Jews in Flo- 
rence, when, in 1485, they bamboozled and exploited Giovanni 
Pico, Count della Mirandola and titular Prince of Concordia, 
extracting enormous sums from the too wealthy young man while 
filling his vigorous, but adolescent, mind with Kabbalistic hocus- 
pocus, telling him it was the true essence of Christianity. From 
Pico the clue leads directly to Reuchlin, Pfefferkorn, Luther (who 
was tactfully guided by his helpful Jewish friends until late in his 
life, when he perceived how they had used him), Ulrich von Hut- 
ten, and the ghastly Wars of Religion that convulsed Europe for 
three centuries. It would be absurd to claim that the catastrophe 
was the result of a Jewish plot, but it is legitimate to pose the 
question to what extent Jewish intrigues and manipulations con- 
tributed to it. That is a problem that could be the Hauptwerk of a 
diligent and objective historian willing to devote his life to the 
requisite research. 

(8) The Jews' religion, which, as presented to the goyim, 
seems to validate their boasts of a peculiar "righteousness," 
makes possible the greater part of their secular (i.e., economic 
and social) subversion and eventual destruction of the nations 
they invade. It must be remembered that the Jews operate by dis- 
covering and exploiting causes of dissent within nations, inciting 
classes and comparable groups within the nation to reciprocal 
antagonism, and exacerbating the rivalries to the point of civil 
war, until the nation is paralyzed and reduced to masses of indi- 
viduals who no longer feel they have anything in common except 
the geographical territory they inhabit. The Jewish technique, as 
was too candidly explained by the notorious agitator, Herbert 
Aptheker, consists in finding large groups of goyim who can be 
isolated from the rest of the society on the basis of some eco- 
nomic, occupational, regional, cultural, sexual, or racial interest 



they have in common, persuading them that they are "oppressed" 
by the wicked society, inciting them to hatred of their "oppres- 
sors" and making them greedy for the profits they think they can 
gain by "demanding their rights," and thus setting each group 
against all others until the nation is paralysed by pseudo-legal 
contention that may hopefully be expected to eventuate in civil 
wars, massive massacres, and a reversion to total barbarism. The 
Jews, who are always careful to wail that they are a "persecuted 
minority" with a passion for godly "justice," are thus ideally pre- 
pared to incite the "underprivileged" to outbreaks for "social jus- 
tice," and it is, of course, well known that all of the multiple 
forms of subversion are directed by Jews, often quite openly, 
although they usually try to associate with them some hired or 
light-headed members of each group they are inciting to what will 
be, in the end, self-destruction. 

(9) The same parade of religiosity facilitates the other princi- 
pal offensive against the occupied nation, if it belongs to our 
race, which is morbidly susceptible to rhetorical appeals to senti- 
mentality and "ideals," i.e., fancied changes of the real world to 
make it more pleasant, usually by some magical transformation of 
human nature. Aryans, especially females, are easily intoxicated 
by rhapsodic talk about "all mankind," "the brotherhood of 
man," "world peace," "equality of races," "all men are born 
equal," and similar nonsense. That adult Aryans believe in such 
things without help from lysergic acid or even alcohol is simply 
proof of Kipling's observation that "Words are the most powerful 
drugs used by mankind." The Jews cannot be held responsible for 
the mental weakness they exploit, nor even for their success in 
exploiting it. In the United States, for example, they have for 
decades been openly inciting the Congoids to plunder, beat, 
rape, and murder their white "oppressors," and the white Ameri- 
cans are not only so craven and masochistic that they submit 



themselves and their children to the savages' outrages, but so fat- 
uous that they believe the Jews' pretense that they are acting out 
of concern for the "underprivileged" savages rather than out of 
hatred for the Aryans as well as to profit from the misfortunes of 
the modern Canaanites, whose country they have effectively 
occupied. The Jews' contempt for their befuddled and spineless 
victims is probably justified, but I think it obvious that their suc- 
cess was made possible in the United States, as, according to 
Philo, it was in Canaan, by the awe excited by their religious pro- 
fessions in the minds of the unwitting enemies whose country 
they invaded. 






This summary of the Jews' most useful devices leaves us, of 
course, with the question how it is possible for the dispersed and 
widely scattered members of the race to act with what amounts to 
unanimity and perfect coordination. It is scarcely credible that so 
large a number of individuals, many of them showing a low order 
of intelligence, could carry out such operations according to a 
consciously formed plan on which they have all previously 
agreed. The great mass of Jews seem to be, almost without excep- 
tion, under the tight control and discipline of their fairly numer- 
ous leaders, who could, in turn, be equally subject to the orders 
of a supreme and secret directorate, which plans and directs a 
conscious strategy as set forth in the famous "Protocols." This is 
possible, although Aryans are apt to think most unlikely an oper- 
ation of which they would be utterly incapable — of which they 
are, we must believe, genetically incapable, since their earliest 
records, in the Homeric traditions, the Norse legends, and even 
the Vedas, attest the great difficulty of maintaining an effective 
consensus within even compact and comparatively small bands 
for specific, immediate, and limited ends. It is a pernicious and 
perhaps fatal error, characteristic of our race, to assume that 
other races have approximately the same nature as ours, so that 
argument against a conscious and concerted conspiracy must be 
discarded. The alternative to that theory, so far as I can see, can 
be only an hypothesis that the Jews are directed by instinct, at 
least to a large extent. They may represent a complex and highly 
advanced form of the biological phenomenon of which a simple 
manifestation is seen in mammals that hunt in packs or bands. 
As is well known, wolves and African wild dogs, for example, 
hunt in organized packs and stalk and bring down their game by 



a kind of strategy that is carried out by the pack as a unit but with 
each individual in it having a definite function and adapting him- 
self to the needs of a specific situation. This activity we attribute 
to instincts operating entirely below the level of real conscious- 
ness. African baboons form bands that are really small tribes hav- 
ing an oligarchic government, and their survival under very 
adverse conditions is proof that they adapt their presumably 
instinctive methods to new conditions, and that they learn by 
experience and observation. It is assumed, however, partly from 
the structure of the baboon's brain and the absence of a real lan- 
guage, that the species is not capable of conscious thought. On 
the other hand, we are aware that, although we may, on strictly 
objective grounds, identify our race as having a peculiar capacity 
for objective thought, many of our actions are determined by 
instinctual and subconscious reactions (e.g., our perception of 
beauty, fear of death, reaction to odors and sounds, etc.), how- 
ever much we may consciously try to rationalize them or to alter 
them by efforts of the will that are likely to produce schizophre- 

It is entirely possible, therefore, that a species could have 
been formed by biological selection that automatically preys on 
our species as instinctively as wolves prey on caribou, although, of 
course, with much greater cunning and versatility. 




This hypothesis is open to the objection that, so far as we 
can tell, a distinct change has taken place in the Jews' activity in 
this century and at approximately the time of the "Protocols." 

Before this, the aliens seem to have been content to exploit 
the Aryans and, in biological terms, feed on them; the present 
objective is obviously extermination of our species through mon- 
grelization and massacres, so that it would seem that the organiza- 
tion and domination of the Jewish colonies by the Zionists 
produced a change in purpose that must, to a large extent at least, 
have been consciously determined and planned. 

This implies some measure of rule by some kind of director- 
ate that has the ability and power to set objectives for the race. 
The alternative is to explain the change as a natural result of the 
progressive weakening of our race by less direct attacks during the 
past thousand years or more, comparable to the change in the 
activity of a wolf pack when it senses that the harried caribou are 
nearing exhaustion. 

Whatever the explanation, the Jews' determination to exter- 
minate the Aryans is not unreasonable. 

One may see a good analogy in the cattle that are raised in 
the southwestern part of the United States. For a long time, the 
favorite breed was the 'Texas Long-horn,' which was hardy, able 
to fight off coyotes and other predators, and to survive in the 
wilds until it was rounded up by the cowboys for a long drive to 
the market, but it was also a dangerous animal that would attack 
its owners when provoked. It is now virtually extinct, having been 
replaced on the ranches by more docile breeds, such as the 'Black 
Angus,' since the predators have been exterminated and the cat- 
tle now graze within fences or are simply fattened on corn pro- 



vided for them, and the vigor of the potentially dangerous 'Long- 
horn' is no longer needed, while the more docile and sluggish 
animals yield more tender meat. 

Early in the Twentieth Century, Aryans had, for all practical 
purposes, subjugated the entire world and made it everywhere 
both safe and convenient for the Jews, whereas events in Ger- 
many in the 1930s proved that Aryans could be dangerous to the 
Master Race, if they got out of control. Elimination of the species 
seems therefore a logical step for the self-styled 'God-people.' 




I shall add a disquieting consideration that, so far as I know, 
no other Aryan has taken into account. It is based on the work of 
Dr. Alfred Nossig, whose manual of advice to his race on the best 
means of expeditiously taking possession of the entire planet, 
published simultaneously in Austria, Germany, and the United 
States (Integrales Judentum; Vienna, Berlin, New York, 1922), must 
once have been widely distributed, but has now become 
extremely rare, so that I had to search for years before finding 
even a battered copy of it. Most of what he says is, of course, mere 
commonplace to anyone who has observed the Jews' techniques, 
but there is one claim which, if true, explains much and leaves us 
with little or no hope, no matter what may happen in the future: 
he boasts of a genetic infiltration of our race that probably renders 
us helpless. 

According to Dr. Nossig, any taint of Jewish blood ("ein ein- 
ziges judisches Bluttropfchen") will so alter the brain cells 
("Gehirnganglien") of many subsequent generations of an appar- 
ently pure Aryan family that the descendants will be susceptible 
to Jewish propaganda and can readily be mobilized against their 
own race. What is more, Dr. Nossig seems to reject the usual Jew- 
ish view that the genes of Jewishness, like haemophilia, are trans- 
mitted only through females, so that only the offspring of 
Jewesses, regardless of the race of their father, are real Jews. (This, 
of course, explains such varied phenomena as the degeneration 
of the British aristocracy, which some observers trace partly to 
the common practice of covetous or necessitous Britons of marry- 
ing their sons to Jewesses who were provided with fat dowries and 
often dunked in holy water to make them more acceptable, and 
the kidnapping of male German infants in 1944-45, who were 



taken to Israel as breeding stock to improve the physique of the 
race.) Dr. Nossig, astonishingly, seems to believe that the heredity 
is transmitted by Jews of either sex. This means that, for example, 
if a Jew in 1800 seduced and impregnated an Aryan matron, her 
descendants, even today after many generations (which would 
still be less than "eine lange Reihe von Generationen") of mar- 
riages to pure Aryan stock, would all have the Jewish tumor in 
their brains and be subject to control through it. And when one 
tries to guess in how many nests the invading cuckoos may have 
laid their eggs through the centuries, one shudders. 

Dr. Nossig is obviously convinced that the genes of Jewish- 
ness are not only dominant, but have a power of dominance 
greater than is attested for the genes of any physical trait. That 
does not conform to the theories held by most modern geneti- 
cists, but I can find no scientific corroboration or refutation of 
the claim, and I need not point out the methodological obstacles 
in the way of determination of the inheritance of specific mental 
traits in individuals, even if research on that subject were freely 




The current intensive promotion of occult hocus-pocus, 
which so generally afflicts the young who have been intellectually 
disinherited and sabotaged in the public boob-incubators, seems 
to indicate that many people who have no religion have an 
instinctive appetite for some substitute for it. A few highly intelli- 
gent members of our race, including some I have observed in the 
graduate schools, men as well as members of the religious sex, 
who are, of course, too intelligent to practice witchcraft or drug 
themselves with mescaline or lysergic acid to "get in touch with 
the infinite," want to believe in metempsychosis (an old Aryan 
faith, at least!) and in some cosmic intelligence roughly compara- 
ble to the Hindu Brahma (neuter) that governs the universe in 
conformity with some Higher Purpose. 

A certain religiosity, a desire or need to believe in magic and 
miracles (which, of course, imply the existence of a praeterhuman 
power capable of producing them), may be biologically innate in 
all races and perhaps even in some species of mammals that are 
not anthropoid. That, at least, is an hypothesis that I have often 
considered. Many readers probably know Eugene Marais' major 
work, The Soul of the Ape (i.e., baboons — I am told that the mis- 
nomer comes in the translation from the Afrikaans, in which the 
title has a word that designates both apes and the larger mon- 
keys), but may not have seen his earlier and much shorter work 
which was translated and published shortly after his death under 
the title M;y Friends, the Baboons. In it Marais reports that when he 
and his assistant were observing a colony of baboons and had suc- 
ceeded in establishing friendly relations with them, they were 
awakened one night by an unprecedented visit from the domi- 
nant males who were the oligarchs of the baboon troop. They 



finally understood that they were being invited to visit the lair of 
the troop, and following those leaders they were conducted to the 
troop's sleeping place, where they found a number of females 
mourning over offspring that had apparently died of some epi- 
demic disease. So far as Marais could determine, he had been 
invited in the hope that he could and would resurrect the dead 
baboon-children and restore them to life. There was sadness and 
howling when he departed without having performed the desired 
miracle. Anatole France has written a very plausible essay on 
dogs, who regard men as their gods with a piety which, France 
hints, does not essentially differ from the religious piety of 
human beings except that the dogs can see and touch their dei- 
ties and so know that they exist, whereas human beings have to 
content themselves with figments of their imaginations. 

We must consider the possibility that our race, though dis- 
tinguished, of course, for its unique ability for scientific research, 
may also have a particular (and possibly related) tendency toward, 
or desire for, religious belief. This makes us vulnerable to numer- 
ous hoaxes and impostures, particularly the kinds typically, per- 
haps instinctively, created by Jews. There is, I think, a great deal 
of truth in Spengler's identification and description of the Faus- 
tian soul of our civilization with its yearning for the infinite as its 
idee maitresse. Infinity can be temporal as well as spatial, and it is 
easy to see that this tendency of the racial mentality would natu- 
rally produce a very strong and intense desire for immortality. As 
Nietzsche said in his midnight hymn, "Doch alle Lust will 
Ewigkeit, — will tiefe, tiefe Ewigkeit!" 




In the preceding pages I have avoided specific consideration 
of Christianity, although, so far as I can judge from experience 
with my own writings, about 15% of the Christians are alert 
enough to see my implications. 

I think I have a greater sympathy for Christianity than my 
readers imagine, for I not only recognize it as a belief that was for 
a long time part of our civilization and produced such splendid 
monuments as the great cathedrals, but I also regard it as having 
been a consolation and boon to the great majority of our own 
people and one that I am sorry so many must now do without. 
(This is something quite different from the social utility of super- 
natural sanctions that may be the indispensable basis of a gener- 
ally accepted and observed morality.) My feeling for Christianity 
is, I think, expressed by what I consider one of the best poems of 
Sir William Watson, "The Churchyard." 

I wandered far in the wold, 
And after the heat and glare, 
I came at eve to a churchyard old: 
The yew-trees seemed at prayer. 

And around me was dust in dust; 
And the fleeting light; and Repose; 
And the infinite pathos of human trust 
In a God whom no man knows. 

It is that infinite pathos that touches me deeply. Sunt lacrv 
mat rerum, if you remember your Vergil. 



Before we consider Christianity vis a vis the Jewish survival 
strategy, let me first make two generalizations: 

(1) The power and value of a religion has nothing to do with 
the personality or probity of its founder. The best example of that 
is provided by the Mormons, who are today the most solid and 
stable cult in the United States, and who successfully resisted 
longer than any other large church the contagious decay that 
quickly reduced all others, with the exception of some small, scat- 
tered, and discordant Fundamentalist churches and some pock- 
ets of Traditionalist Catholics, to the contemptible quackery of a 
"social gospel" and hypocritical irrationality. This really astonish- 
ing and massive religious edifice was founded by one Joseph 
Smith, a petty swindler who began his career by fleecing suckers 
by means of a magic stone through which he could see treasure 
buried in the earth, but after he was arrested and got off with a 
promise not to do it again, turned to the safer and much more 
lucrative racket of swindling suckers with religion. He founded a 
great church, but there is reason to believe that he didn't give a 
damn what happened to it after he was dead and probably didn't 
expect it to last. Smith, of course, was a man about whom we 
have a great deal of information, both about his life and about 
his doctrines, whereas we know nothing whatsoever about Jesus 
except the myths associated with his name, and these are so vari- 
ous, contradictory, and late that he is, for all practical purposes, a 
mythical figure, like Adonis or Mithra, even if there was a man by 
that name (as is likely) about whom the myths were assembled. If 
it were possible to ascertain who he was and what he did, it 
would not in the least matter if he were found to be a character 
no more admirable than Joseph Smith. 

(2) The Jesus-cults that existed in the Roman Empire are 
connected with Western Christianity only in that some of them 
provided a pseudo-historical story that was accepted by the West 



(our ancestors simply ignored the parts that our minds found dis- 
tasteful), and a confused metaphysical doctrine expressed in 
words that our people misunderstood and progressively reinter- 
preted until the original meaning was completely forgotten. This 
is true not only of the rank jungle of Jesus-cults that flourished in 
the Second Century and thereafter, but also of the "orthodox" 
Christianity which came into being under the successors of Con- 
stantine. As Spengler points out in the second volume of the 
Untergang, even the "orthodox" Christianity of the last days of the 
Roman Empire was still essentially a Magian cult and, as such, 
was unintelligible to the Faustian mind, and he observes that 
Augustine, though revered by the Western church, would have 
regarded the Christianity of Anselm or St. Thomas or Luther as 
an abominable and incomprehensible heresy — and so would the 
other supposed "Fathers of the Church." They were fathers his- 
torically, of course, but had they known the Christianity of Medi- 
aeval Europe, they would indignantly have repudiated it as a 
bastard with whom they had no connection. 

There was no such thing as an 'orthodox' Christianity 
before the last two decades of the Fourth Century, when one 
bunch of holy men got hold of Theodosius (by explaining to him 
how advantageous it would be for him to cooperate with them) 
and so were able to use the police power of the state to repress 
and kill their competitors, the Arians, who had been the officially 
sanctioned brand of Christians (and so "orthodox"!) before that 
time. (The Arians, now called 'heretics' retrospectively, were 
guilty of being sufficiently logical to claim that a father was neces- 
sarily older than his son, and they naturally regarded as very stu- 
pid heretics the mystery-mongers who claimed that a father and 
his son had been born at the same time. The latter, however, were 
clever enough to back Theodosius before he pushed his way to 
the throne and to back Gratian against his father, and once they 



got their hands on the imperial power, they were clever enough to 
prevent potential competitors from muscling them out.) The neat 
trick that holy men use today is to describe as 'heretics' the innu- 
merable Christian sects that did not have doctrines that can con- 
veniently be twisted into conformity with what became 
'orthodox' by decree of Theodosius in 381, thus leading the 
unwary layman to suppose that there was an 'orthodox' Chris- 
tianity before that time. They also conceal the fact that if the 
brand that got power in 381 is orthodoxy, then all Western Chris- 
tianity is a heresy, and they themselves are, by that definition, 

The only honest thing to do is to apply the term 'Christian' 
to all the sects that claimed to be followers of a Jesus entitled 
'Christus,' who was really or supposedly executed in Judaea in 
the time of Tiberius or thereabouts. When Christians become 
conspicuous, late in the Second Century, most of them were 
Jews, and it is probable that the numerous letters of Paul, includ- 
ing both those that were incorporated in the "New Testament" 
anthology when it was put together and those that were excluded 
for some reason, were manufactured at this time by Jews who 
wanted to take in goyim on easy terms. (These fabrications proba- 
bly included the forged correspondence of Seneca with Paul, 
which seems to have been known to Tertullian.) This was a prin- 
cipal difference among the numerous Christian sects. The Naza- 
renes, whose holy book was a "Gospel According to the 
Hebrews," of which fragments survive, and who spoke only Ara- 
maic in their rites, held that only Jews by race could be Chris- 
tians, since Christ, when he returned to butcher the hated goyim, 
naturally wanted only Jews to rule the world. A compromise was 
made by the Ebionites, who had, inter alia, a "Gospel of Mat- 
thew" that was certainly older than the diluted rifacimento that 
got into the "New Testament," and who preached a perfect com- 



munism, with all property and women to belong to everyone in 
common; they held that goyim, if they were circumcised and went 
through ceremonies to purge them of their native vileness, could 
become Christians second-class, as I will show below. The Carpo- 
cratians, who seem to have been a numerous and powerful sect in 
their day, admitted goyim on equal terms, since Salvation was for 
all those who had been 'redeemed by Christ' from servitude to 
man-made laws and materialism. Christ had come to free man- 
kind from oppression and to bestow on the righteous a new free- 
dom: what matters is spiritual salvation, and we must show our 
emancipation from material things by recognizing no human law 
whatsoever and by feeling free to indulge any lust and perform 
any act to which the spirit may move us. Like the Ebionites, the 
Carpocratians preached a total communism, with all property 
and women to be for the use of everyone. They admitted women 
for the sake of general promiscuity in the modern manner, and 
although they had no objection to homosexuality, they thus dif- 
fered from some other brands of Christians, who excluded 
females as "unworthy of the Kingdom of God" and practiced 
only male homosexuality. There were many other Christian sects, 
each with its own revelations from God via Jesus, such as the 
Naasenes, who worshipped snakes as symbols and incarnations of 
divine power because snakes shed their skins periodically and so 
are born again and live forever; the Adamites, whose specialty was 
going nude in public to show that they had been redeemed by 
Christ from original sin and were thereby emancipated from all 
the laws of sinful man; and scores of others. 

My guess is that the Carpocratians and similar canaille were 
the dominant sects of Christianity until the persecutions by the 
wicked pagan emperors in the Third Century made those forms 
of Christianity unpopular because likely to be unhealthy. The 
tales of the martyrs are all fiction, of course, (Jerome, in a letter 



that was included, doubtless by oversight, in the official collec- 
tion of his correspondence, boasts of his skill in inventing martyr- 
stories to edify the faithful), but some Roman emperors did make 
systematic attempts to enforce respect for law and accepted moral- 
ity by trying to excise the Christian tumor on the state, and I 
think it likely that these persecutions were sufficiently successful 
to leave the Gospel-business open to sects that at least professed 
the relatively innocuous doctrines that finally became "ortho- 

Our holy men try to dodge the facts of early Christianity by 
calling "gnostic" all the sects that weren't "orthodox" by stan- 
dards that were not devised before the Fourth Century. This, of 
course, is sheer dishonesty. A "Gnosticism" is a religious sect that 
claims to have a gnosis, a knowledge of supernatural things, 
revealed to them by some Savior who was either an incarnate god 
or a divinely-inspired superman. Obviously, all Christian sects are 
Gnostic in that sense, because they all claim to be based on reve- 
lations made by Christ, who, in the various sects, was regarded as 
having been either an incarnation of a god or a man whom John 
the Baptist or some other prophet had pumped full of Holy 
Spirit. In the first four centuries A.D. the world was full of Gnos- 
tics peddling special revelations, and, of course, Christ was only 
one of the Saviors: others were Baruch, Gamaliel, Tat (= the 
Egyptian god Toth), Seth (Egyptian god), Balaam, Ezechiel, Adam 
(whose books had just been discovered), Moses, Enoch, Mar- 
sanes, Nicotheus, Phosilampes, Mithra, Zoroaster, Zervan, et al., 
et al. In the early centuries of our era, the Near East was a Bed- 
lam filled with the insane ravings of fakirs peddling their Saviors 
and their forged Gospels, and at this distance it is impossible to 
tell the difference between madmen, hallucines who got visions 
of god from eating the sacred mushroom, Amanita muscaria, and 
shysters fleecing the yokels with mystic gabble. One cannot read 



much of the gibberish without feeling queasy and dizzy, but for a 
quick survey of the stuff that our holy men want to sweep under 
the rug, see Jean Doresse, Les livres secrets des Gnostiques d'Egypte, 
Paris, 1959, which surveys the books found at Chenoboskion a 
few years before. The one significant thing is that the peddlers of 
all forms of Gnosticism (including Christian cults before the 
Third Century) were almost all Jews. If you will look in your Scien- 
tific American for January 1973, pp. 80-87, you will note that the 
author has to admit that "it becomes increasingly evident that 
much of Gnosticism is probably of Jewish origin." He is naturally 
cautious, wary of offending God's Peculiar People. Although I 
admit that one cannot identify the race of some of the more 
prominent Salvation-hucksters, I think it significant that those 
whom one can identify racially always turn out to be Jews, and I 
would delete "much of" and "probably" in the author's state- 

There can be no question but that Christianity was origi- 
nally a Jewish promotion, and it is noteworthy that the Christians 
who try to make their cult respectable in the Third Century 
claim that they repudiate the Jews. One of the earliest to do this 
was Tertullian, a Carthaginian shyster, whose Apologeticum, a 
defense of Christianity, was written at the very beginning of the 
Third Century. He asserts that Christianity is not a conspiracy of 
revolutionaries and degenerates, as was commonly believed, and 
claims that it is an association of loving brothers who have pre- 
served the faith that the Jews forsook — which has been the com- 
mon story ever since. Our holy men salvage Tertullian by 
claiming that he was "orthodox" in his early writings, but then, 
alas! became a Montanist heretic, poor fellow. Tertullian is the 
author of the famous dictum that he believes the impossible 
because it is absurd (credo quia absurdum), so he is naturally dear 
to the heart of the pious. How much Jerome and other saints 



have tampered with the facts to make Tertullian seem "orthodox" 
in his early works has been most fully shown by Timothy Barnes 
in his Tertullian (Oxford, 1971), but even he spends a hundred 
pages pawing over chronological difficulties that can be recon- 
ciled by what seems to me the simple and obvious solution: Ter- 
tullian, who was evidently a pettifogging lawyer before he got into 
the Gospel-business, had sense enough to eliminate from his 
brief for the Christians facts that would have displeased the 
pagans whom he was trying to convince that Christians repre- 
sented no threat to civilized society; he accordingly concealed in 
his apologetic works the peculiar doctrines of the Christian sect 
to which he had been originally "converted," but he naturally 
expounded those doctrines in writings intended, not for the eyes 
of wicked pagans, but for other brands of Christians, whom he 
wished to convert to his own sect, which was that of Montanus, a 
very Holy Prophet (divinely inspired, of course) who was a Phry- 
gian, not a Jew, and who had learned from chats with God that 
since the Jews had muffed their big opportunity at the time of 
the Crucifixion, Jesus, when he returned next year or the year 
after that, was going to set up his New Jerusalem in Phrygia after 
he had raised hell with the pagans and tormented and butchered 
them in all of the delightful ways so lovingly described in the 
Apocalypse, the Hymn of Hate that still soothes the souls of "fun- 
damentalist" Christians today. If, in his Apologeticum and similar 
works, Tertullian had told the stupid pagans that they were going 
to be tortured and exterminated in a year or two, they might have 
doubted that Christians were the innocent little lambs that Ter- 
tullian claimed they were. 

Tertullian writes semi-literate bombast. The first Christian 
who can write decent Latin is Minucius Felix, whose Octavius, 
written in the first half (possibly the first quarter) of the Third 
Century must have done much to make Christianity respectable. 



He concentrates on ridiculing pagan myths that no educated 
man believed anyway and on denying that Christians (he means 
his kind, of course!) practice incest (a favorite recreation of many 
sects that had been saved by Christ from the tyranny of human 
laws) or cut the throats of children to obtain blood for Holy 
Communion (as some groups undoubtedly did). He argues for a 
monotheism that is indistinguishable from the Stoic except that 
the One God is identified as the Christian deity, from whose 
worship the sinful Jews are apostates, and insists that Christians 
have nothing to do with the Jews, whom God is going to punish. 
What is interesting is that Minucius has nothing to say about any 
specifically Christian doctrine, and that the names of Jesus or 
Christ do not appear in his work. There is just one allusion: the 
pagans say that Christianity was founded by a felon (unnamed) 
who was crucified. That, says Minucius, is absurd: no criminal 
ever deserved, nor did a man of this world have the power, to be 
believed to be a god (erratis, qui putatis deum credi aut meruisse nox- 
ium aut potuisse terrenum). That ambiguous reference is all that he 
has to say about it; he turns at once to condemning the Egyptians 
for worshipping a mortal man, and then he argues that the sign 
of the cross represents (a) the mast and yard of a ship under sail, 
and (b) the position of man who is worshipping God properly, 
i.e. standing with outstretched arms. If Minucius is not merely 
trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the gullible pagans, it cer- 
tainly sounds as though this Christian were denying the divinity 
of Christ, either regarding him, as did many of the early Chris- 
tians, as man who was inspired but was not to be identified with 
God, or claiming, as did a number of later sects, that what 
appeared on earth and was crucified was merely a ghost, an 
insubstantial apparition sent by Christ, who himself prudently 
stayed in his heaven above the clouds and laughed at the fools 



who thought they could kill a phantom. Of course, our holy men 
are quite sure that he was "orthodox." 

Whether the Christians, of whom there is no certain histor- 
ical trace before c. 112, were simply a modified or disguised con- 
tinuation of the Chrestiani (i.e., the followers of a Jewish christ 
who, under the assumed name of Chrestus, evidently persuaded 
at least the rabble of the huge Jewish colony planted in Rome 
that the time to start butchering the goyim had come) cannot be 
determined. The word that Tacitus used, as shown by the original 
reading of the Medicean manuscript (which can still be seen 
beneath the erasure and "correction" by a later hand) was Chres- 
tiani ("quos per flagitia invisos vulgus Chrestianos appellabat"), 
and the accuracy of that spelling is guaranteed by the fact that 
Tertullian complains in 197 A.D. and later that the members of 
his sect are called Chrestiani by the wicked pagans, which isn't 
right at all, because the correct word is Christiani. 

This is significant because J(pr|GT6(; [Chrestus], 'useful, ser- 
viceable, good,' is a common Greek word and was a name fre- 
quently given to slaves of Oriental origin (retained by them as a 
cognomen when they were emancipated) and was also commonly 
taken as a name by persons of the lower classes in Asia Minor 
who wanted to be known by an intelligible Greek name in place 
of the outlandish Semitic or other native name that was properly 
theirs (much as Chinese in this country call themselves 'Charlie' 
or 'Mike'). Cicero's friend, Curio, for example, had a slave or 
freedman named Chrestus, whom he employed as a kind of jour- 
nalist to draw up summaries of daily events in Rome for transmis- 
sion as news to his friends who were out of Italy. Many persons of 
that name are known. One of them was a Jewish revolutionary 
agitator, Chrestus, who was regarded as the leader of one of the 
big Jewish outbreaks in Rome, which, as we know from Sueto- 



nius (Claud. 25.4), was accompanied by rioting and outrages so 
gross that Claudius ran all the Jews (except, of course, those who 
had bought citizenship) out of the city. (It did not work, of 
course, for while he was having one thrown out of the front door, 
two were probably crawling in the back windows, and a few years 
later Rome was more crowded with Jews than ever, and Claudius, 
when they again made themselves more obnoxious than usual, 
decided they were too numerous and too deeply entrenched in 
the economic life of the city to be expelled, and tried to control 
them by suppressing their synagogues in the city (Cassius Dio, 
LX.6.8). The date of the particular outbreak of which Chrestus 
was the leader is uncertain. It is assigned to 49-50 A.D. by Koes- 
termann, who has a good article on this subject in Historia, XVI 
(1967), 456-469, but it could have been an outbreak of Jews six or 
seven years earlier. Accepting Koestermann's date, it occurred 
between fourteen and fifteen years before the burning of Rome 
in 64 A.D., for which Nero blamed the Chrestiani, who were cer- 
tainly regarded as a gang or rather horde of Jews who were trying 
to destroy civilization in the manner of Chrestus, whom they may 
have venerated as their Karl Marx or Trotsky (Bronstein). 

What happened to Chrestus is not known, but it is not 
impossible he hid to avoid arrest, got out of Rome, and went 
back to Judaea, if he had been there before, or, if he had not, 
chose it as a good place to stir up more trouble for civilized men. 
If so, he could have been arrested and executed there by the 
Roman authorities. If so, he could have been the basis on which 
the later myths about Jesus (a very common Jewish name, which 
could well have been his) were constructed. It is a curious fact 
that one of the earliest Christian forgeries, known already to Ter- 
tullian and antedating most or all of the New Testament, is a sup- 
posed letter from Pontius Pilatus describing the Crucifixion, and 
exists in two versions that are addressed to Claudius as well as in 



the standard versions in which the reigning emperor is Tiberius. 
It is hard to see why any Christians should have seen an advan- 
tage in placing the Crucifixion so late, but it would be under- 
standable if the story originally concerned Chrestus and the date 
was moved farther back when it was decided that it would be bet- 
ter to change the name to Christus and pretend that there was no 
connection. A change from Chrestus to Christus would have 
been easy to put over by the end of the Second Century, when 
the increasing itacism in Greek pronunciation gave eta and iota 
the same sound in popular speech. There would be the further 
advantage that the new name would be unique and unprece- 
dented as a personal name, instead of being a very common 
name among the lower classes. 

The word ^piOTOQ [Christus], 'salve, ointment,' was natu- 
rally never a name given to persons, but in contemporary Yiddish 
(i.e., the Jewish dialect of Greek) it was for some reason used as 
an epithet applied to the Jewish kings who appear in stories in 
the Old Testament, implying that they had been 'anointed' and 
so were legitimate. It does occur in the Septuagint. It thus 
acquired among Jews a connotation that would have made it a 
logical title to be assumed by a revolutionary agitator who 
claimed to be a legitimate king of the Jews and also the Messiah 
whom the Jews had long been awaiting with the expectation that 
his supernatural powers would enable them to butcher the hated 
Indo-Europeans without fear of reprisals. It is entirely possible 
that there was such an agitator, distinct from Chrestus, in the 
time of Tiberius and that he was executed by the Roman gover- 
nor of Judaea at that time. You will notice that the stories in the 
New Testament contain clear vestiges of a claim to be the 'King of 
the Jews,' which the authors of the stories find it necessary to 
explain away. In the absence of any historical record one can only 
speculate, of course, but on the whole I think it more likely that 



there was an agitator or thaumaturgist named Jesus (i.e. Yeshua\ a 
common contraction of Yehoshua\ like Jake for Jacob) in the time 
of Tiberius than that the whole story was reconstructed from the 
career of Chrestus. Palestine was full of goetae, fakirs, peddling 
miracles and revelations to the multitude, and it would not be at 
all astonishing if one of them tried to set himself up in competi- 
tion to the established Jewish priests with fatal results or even 
started a revolutionary movement of some sort that the Roman 
government nipped in the bud. 

The foregoing will explain why it is nearly certain that the 
Chrestiani executed by Nero in 64 A.D. were a mob of Jewish rev- 
olutionaries, followers of the notorious Chrestus, who had led 
the destructive outbreak fourteen or more years before. There is 
thus no historical evidence for the existence of Christians at so 
early a date. (The term 'Christian' should obviously be applied 
only to sects that claim to be derived from a Christus distinct 
from Chrestus.) For further information on this subject, see the 
article by Koestermann cited above. 

Pliny's letter is our earliest historical evidence for Christians. 
Pliny was in Bithynia in 112 A.D., and at that time the Christians 
probably had not yet concocted any 'gospels,' although it is possi- 
ble, of course, that they had some in secret and were able to con- 
ceal them from him. (There is a translation with the text of the 
letter in the Loeb series.) They convinced Pliny that they were just 
a bunch of ignorant and superstitious, but innoxious, fanatics, 
and, as is evident from the letter, Pliny was really astonished to 
find no evidence that they were guilty of the crimes (such as ritual 
murders) and anarchistic subversion that he naturally associated 
with the name. Since his is the only historical evidence for Chris- 
tians at so early a date, we have no means of knowing whether he 
confused Christiani with Chrestiani (who may still have been active 
at that time — the Jews were always conspiring against civilization 



and may have kept the name) — a confusion that was particularly 
easy because a Roman would have thought it unlikely that a 
group would call itself 'the people of the salve/ which is all the 
name would mean to anyone who was not a Jew — or there were 
Christians (i.e., persons who claimed to be followers of a Chris- 
tus, not Chrestus) who did practice ritual murders and the like. 
There were such later. 

It is certain that the earliest known sects of "Christians," 
i.e., followers of one or another of the agitators named Jesus, 
were enemies of, and probably conspirators against, the Graeco- 
Romans. The Nazarenes admitted only Jews; the Ebionites, in 
conformity with the doctrine stated explicitly in the "New Testa- 
ment" (Marc. 7.27-29), although most Christians are too stupid to 
understand what they read, admitted goyim to the status of "whin- 
ing dogs," provided they had themselves circumcised and obeyed 
their divinely-appointed masters, promising them that when 
Jesus returned with celestial reinforcements and inflicted on the 
hated Greeks and Romans all the slaughter and torment that is 
so enthusiastically described in the apocalypse that was included 
in the "New Testament," the proselytes would be permitted to lie 
on the floor behind the tables at which the triumphant Jews ban- 
quet and to eat the table scraps thrown to them. This promise, 
however, understandably failed to attract large numbers of goyim, 
and the superstition got under way only when its doctrines had 
been modified to facilitate the "conversion" of large numbers of 
the mongrelized inhabitants of the once-Roman Empire. Many of 
the early Christian sects disclaimed in various ways a connection 
with the Jews, and it can scarcely be doubted that the anti-Jewish 
passages in the "New Testament" were designed to facilitate com- 
petition with those sects. It is, I think, most significant that the 
Christian sect which shrewdly made a deal with the despots of 
the decaying Roman Empire and thus acquired the legal and mil- 



itary power to exterminate its competitors was one which had 
assembled a hastily collected and slovenly edited anthology of a 
few of the numerous gospels and called it a "New Testament," so 
that it could carry with it an "Old Testament" of Jewish tales to 
prove that the Jews were the Chosen Race of the tribal deity 
whom the Jews had impudently identified with the animus mundi 
of Stoic monotheism as well as with the Ahura-Mazda of the 
Zoroastrian cult. It may also be significant that the Christians 
have always used the normal Jewish techniques of fraud and forg- 
ery, most obviously when they concocted gospels that purport to 
have been written by eyewitnesses of miraculous and impossible 
events. The evidence does not permit us to affirm that Christian- 
ity was cunningly invented by the Jews as a means of paralysing 
the healthy instincts of other races, but we can affirm that if the 
Jews did set out to devise a mental poison that would eventually 
be lethal to our race, they could have concocted no drug that was 
more efficacious in the circumstances. 

I emphatically call your attention to the obvious fact that the 
primitive Christian doctrine is a specific demand for the suicide 
of our race, which survived from the end of the Roman Empire 
to the present only because our ancestors, of fresh barbarian 
stock, simply ignored in practice a large part of the pernicious 
doctrine, especially in northern Europe under essentially aristo- 
cratic regimes. Until the disintegration of Protestantism made it 
possible for any ambitious tailor, clever confidence man, or dis- 
gruntled housewife to have "revelations" and pitch the woo at 
lower classes to make themselves important or fleece the suckers, 
the professional holy men either contented themselves with tell- 
ing our people they were "sinful" or used the common devices of 
theologians to conceal the import of the holy book. (Even so, 
however, the Catholic dervishes are obviously responsible for the 



eventual dominance of mestizos in "Latin" America, and many 
similar misfortunes.) 

For the deplorable acceptance of Christianity by the igno- 
rant barbarians of our race, I have tried to account in my book, 
Christianity and the Survival of the West. I would now change noth- 
ing in that discussion except to make it more emphatic, for in the 
years since I wrote it, I have come to the conclusion that, with 
only numerically insignificant exceptions, the Christians are use- 
less in any effort to preserve our race, and that our domestic ene- 
mies are, from their standpoint, well advised to subsidize, as they 
are now doing, the ranting of evangelical shamans and the revival 
of menticidal superstitions by every means, including the hiring 
of technicians who can pose as "scientists" and "prove," by subtle 
or impudent tricks, the "truth" of the flimsiest hoaxes and the 
most preposterous notions. The development of Christianity in 
all the sects of the Western world during the past two centuries 
has been the progressive elimination from all of them of the ele- 
ments of our natively Aryan morality that were superimposed on 
the doctrine before and during the Middle Ages to make it 
acceptable to our race and so a religion that could not be 
exported as a whole to other races. With the progressive weaken- 
ing of our racial instincts, all the cults have been restored to con- 
formity with the "primitive" Christianity of the holy book, i.e., to 
the undiluted poison of the Jewish originals. I should, perhaps, 
have made it more explicit in my little book that the effective 
power of the alien cult is by no means confined to sects that 
affirm a belief in supernatural beings. As I have stressed in other 
writings, when the Christian myths became unbelievable, they 
left in the minds of even intelligent and educated men a residue, 
the detritus of the rejected mythology, in the form of supersti- 
tions about "all mankind," "human rights," and similar figments 
of the imagination that had gained currency only on the assump- 



tion that they had been decreed by an omnipotent deity, so that 
in practical terms we must regard as basically Christian and reli- 
gious such irrational cults as Communism and the tangle of fan- 
cies that is called "Liberalism" and is the most widely accepted 
faith among our people today. I am a little encouraged that today 
some of the more intelligent "Liberals" are at last perceiving that 
their supposedly rational creed is simply based on the Christian 
myths they have consciously rejected. I note, for example, that 
Mary Kenny, who describes herself as "a former radical" (The Sun- 
day Telegraph, 27 January 1980, pp. 8-9), has come to the realiza- 
tion that "so many of the ["Liberals'"] political ideas... are 
religious at root. The search for equality in the secular sense is a 
replacement of the Judaeo-Christian idea that God loves every 
individual equally. ...The feelings of guilt or, indeed, pity, which 
once went into the religious drive, are being transferred to secular 
ideas to the ultimate destruction of our civilisation." 

So far as there is hope for us, it lies, I think, in this belated 
tendency to take account of biological realities. 






In the foregoing pages I have tried only to suggest what seem 
to me to be the most important phenomena that must be taken 
into account in forming an objective estimate of the Jews and in 
considering dispassionately the present plight of our race and the 
doom that seems to hang over our children and over ourselves, 
unless we are individuals who have already come prope ad ipsos 
exactae aetatis terminos. 

I do not know what, if anything, can be done to preserve a 
species that some judicious observers believe to be driven by a 
largely subconscious, but irresistible, death-wish. In 1914, 
although we had the Jews on our backs, we were indubitably the 
dominant race on earth; we are now a despised and degraded spe- 
cies of anthropoids on whom all other species, including the very 
lowest and most brutish, joyously feed. When I see that our peo- 
ple are either too doltish to perceive their degradation or too cra- 
ven to care, I am close to despair. Even a few decades ago, I 
should not have believed it possible that here in the United 
States Aryans would willingly see their children hauled to 
"schools" to be defiled by enforced association with savages and 
to be robbed, beaten, raped, and mutilated by the animals. Even 
today, I am almost incredulous when I hear chiefs of police on 
the radio urging the white rabbits to minimize the chances that 
they will be mauled or killed by the savages whom they tax them- 
selves to nourish and whom they subsidize to breed faster: in the 
jungles that were once our large cities, the cringing white inhabit- 
ants are told they should not venture out of doors after dark, 
should walk only in the middle of sidewalks so that Congoids are 
less likely to pounce on them from doorways or from automo- 
biles in the street, and must not show themselves in large areas of 



their own cities. Are creatures that accept such degradation capa- 
ble of survival or even fit to live? Is it only that they have been 
enslaved by foul superstitions, or have their brains been so clot- 
ted by centuries of systematic poisoning that they have been ren- 
dered permanently and irremediably imbecile? 

When the Jews invade a nation, their first concern is, as pru- 
dence demands, to acquire control over the minds of their vic- 
tims. In the middle of the Nineteenth Century, Lord Harrington 
told Parliament that the Jews already controlled "a large portion" 
of the British press, and, of course, in other Aryan countries they 
had been equally or more successful. Less than a century later, 
their control over all the means of communication within every 
Aryan nation had become virtually absolute, although a few 
small journals are still permitted to publish some articles that the 
occupying power has not approved. In this connection, it is well 
to remember the dictum of Dzhugashvili (alias Stalin) that a peri- 
odical with a circulation of 10,000 or less was not worth captur- 
ing or suppressing. It is also true that the Jews need to have a 
little open opposition to maintain the fiction that they are "perse- 
cuted," and it is possible that they have encouraged on a small 
scale the more absurd and impractical forms of "anti-Semitism" 
for precisely that purpose. But they seem now to feel that they 
may safely exhibit their arrogance and to have resolved that no 
Aryan cur shall be permitted to bark at his owners or even to 
whimper audibly. 

For all practical purposes, the natural aristocracy of our 
race, which once gave it some sense of direction, has been totally 
destroyed, by revolutionary massacres, by contrived wars for hal- 
lucinatory ends, by economic looting under the guise of "democ- 
racy," by internal corruption through the fostering of its vices, 
and by miscegenation. We are left with what is, on the whole, an 
Aryan proletariat, differentiated only by income, and, especially 



if the income is somewhat above average, willing to submit to 
anything and even to do anything for a few additional dollars, 
pounds, or rand. Our entire population, with almost no signifi- 
cant exceptions, is now at the mercy of, and therefore enslaved 
by, the economic pressures which the Jews exert at the first signs 
of disaffection. Our race's traditional suspicion of "tradesmen" 
was only realistic. The man whose income depends on vending to 
the masses is always subject to temptations to profit that are likely 
to be stronger than any moral restraints he may theoretically 
acknowledge, and today he is no more than a slave at the mercy 
of his masters. Even more precarious is the status of those who 
have no material goods to sell, such as authors, journalists, actors, 
clergymen and other soothsayers, salesmen, advertising agents, 
teachers, and the like, whose livelihood depends entirely on the 
sale of words, mere sounds whether spoken or written, to masses 
whose tastes have been formed by the formidable machinery that 
controls their minds. These facts of economic enslavement lead 
many acute observers to the conclusion that our race's only 
chance of survival lies in the chance that the Jews, blinded by 
their own arrogant confidence in their absolute superiority, will 
permit or precipitate a total collapse of organized society into the 
anarchy in which the strong and resolute will again survive at the 
expense of the weak and foolish. 




Abraham 35 

actors 83 

Adam 68 

Adamites 67 

Adonis 64 

advertising agents 83 

African savages 42 

African wild dogs 55 

Afrikaans 61 

Afrikaners 40 

after dark 81 

Ahasuerus 37 

Ahura-Mazda 77 

Alexander the Great 19 

Alexandria 17, 19, 22, 


Alexandrian citizenship 


all is fair in war 26 

all mankind 52, 78 

Amanita muscaria 68 

ambassadors 23 

Americans 27 

anarchy 83 

Anatomy of the Future 7 

Anglo-Saxons 13 

animus mundi 11 

Annapolis 9 

"Anne Frank's Diary" 


"annihilation of the 

Jews" 8 

anointed 74 

Anselm 65 

antagonism 5 1 

anti-Jewish passages 76 

anti-Semites 8 

anti-Semitism 82 

apes 61 

Apocalypse 70 

apocalypse 76 
Apologeticum 69, 70 
Aptheker, Herbert 5 1 
Arabia Felix 50 
Aramaic 66 
Arians 65 

aristocratic regimes 7 7 
Artaxerxes 37 
Aryan 2 

Aryan morality 78 
Aryan proletariat 82 
Asia Minor 23, 72 
Asiatic 32 
Asiatics 3 1 
Assuerus 37 
assumed names 28 
atheism 42 
atheists 39 
Augustine 65 
Augustus 18, 19, 22 
authors 83 


baboons 56, 61 
Babylon 49 
Babylonian Empire 49 
Babylonian religion 50 
Babylonians 49 
Balaam 68 
barbarian stock 7 7 
Barbillus 23 
Barnes, Timothy 70 
Baruch 68 
Baudelaire 40 
beaten 8 1 
belief 41 
Bell, H. Idris 17 
Benson, Ivor 42 
Beshers, Paul 1 1 
betrayal 10, 12 
Bible 47 

biological inferiority 15 
biological realities 79 
biological selection 56 
biological superiority 5 
biologically degenerate 

Bithynia 75 
Black Angus 57 
black slaves 3 1 
Boman, Dr. Thorleif 43 
Boole of Ceremonial Magic 

brain cells 59 
breeding stock 60 
Britain 7, 13, 15, 27, 40 
British aristocracy 59 
British Empire 13 
British Museum 1 7 
British press 82 
"brotherhood of man" 

Budge, E. A. Wallis 33 
Burg, J. G. 7 
Burgoyne, General 27 
butchered 29, 30 
Butz, Arthur 3 


Caligula 18 

Cambridge Ancient Histo- 
ry 31 

camouflage 46 
Canaan 29 
Canaanites 29, 30 
Canada 24 
capturing 36 
Carpocratians 67 
cathedrals 63 
Catholic 77 
cattle 57 
census 27 
Charlesworth, N. P. 20 



Chenoboskion 69 
Chicago 3, 11 
Chicago Sun-Times 2 
chiefs of police 8 1 
China 9 
Chinese 72 
"Chosen Race" 77 
Chrestiani 72, 73, 75 
Chrestus 72, 73, 74, 75 
Christ 18, 66, 67, 68, 71 
christ 35, 49, 72 
Christ, divinity of 7 1 
Christian 43, 79 
Christian doctrine 77 
Christian forgeries 73 
Christian holy men 3 7 
Christian myths 78, 79 
Christian sects 66, 67, 

Christiani 72, 75 
Christianity 50, 51, 63, 
65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 77, 

Christianity and the Sur- 
vival of the West 78 
Christianity, primitive 

Christianity, Western 

Christians 29, 47, 66, 
76, 77, 78 
"Christians second- 
class" 67 
Christmas tree 3 
christs 40 

Christus 66, 74, 75 
Churchill, Winston 8, 

Churchyard, The 63 
Cicero 72 
circulation 82 

circumcised 76 
citizenship 73 
civil behavior 25 
civil disturbances 19 
civil war 19,30,51 
civil wars 31, 52 
Claudius 17, 18, 19, 20, 

Cleopatra 19 
clergymen 43, 83 
cohesion 6 
communication 82 
Communism 79 
communism 66 
Communists 39 
Concordia 5 1 
Congo ids 52, 81 
Coningsby 13 
conquest 29, 31 
consensus 55 
consolation 63 
conspiracy 45, 55 
Constantine 65 
contrived wars 82 
Controversy of Zion, The 

conversion 76 
converts 45 
coordination 55 
corruption 47, 82 
cosmetae 23 
"cosmic intelligence" 61 
Count della Mirandola 


coyotes 57 
credulity 40 
Crucifixion 70, 73, 74 
cult 46 
cunning 26 

Curio 72 
Cyrus 49 

Cyrus the Great 49 
Czar 37 


Disraeli, Benjamin 13 
Daniel 49 
death-wish 8 1 
deceit 29, 45 
deception 30 
degeneration 59 
degradation 82 
democracy 82 
Detroit Jewish News 28 
dialects 43 

Diogenes Laertius 36 
Dionysius son of Theon 

directorate 57 
disguise 27, 28 
dissent 5 1 
"Divine Race" 41 
docile breeds 57 
Documents Illustrating the 
Reigns of Claudius and 
Nero 20 
dogs 62 
dollars 83 

domestic enemies 28 
dominant race 8 1 
Dominican 10 
Doresse, Jean 69 
dowries 14, 59 
dupes 48 
duplicity 32 
Dutch Reformed 
Church 40 
Dzhugashvili 82 

Earl of Beacons field 13 



Ebionites 66, 61, 16 
economic enslavement 

economic looting 82 
economic pressures 83 
Egypt 17, 19,23,30,31, 
32, 36, 37, 50 
Egyptian gods 32, 68 
Egyptian Magic 33 
Egyptian priests 36 
Egyptians 31, 49, 71 
Egyptologists 33 
elephant 25 
Elephantine 32, 49 
"Elimination of the spe- 
cies" 58 
Endymion 13 
Enoch 68 
envoys 23 
equality 79 
"equality of races" 52 
Esther 38 

Europe 10, 13,50,51, 

Europeans 26 
evil 39 

exemption 23 
exterminated 30 
extermination 28, 57 
Ezechiel 68 

Facts Are Facts 1 1 

fair fight 25 

faith 39 

fakirs 68, 75 

"Fathers of the Church" 


Faustian 62, 65 

fecundity 25 

females, excluded 67 

figments of the imagina- 

tion 42, 78 
Florence 5 1 
forethought 26 
forged 31, 66 
forgery 12, 30, 37, 77 
France 15 
France, Anatole 62 
fraud 45, 77 
Freedman, Benjamin 1 1 
fundamentalist 70 
Fundamentalist church- 
es 64 


Gamaliel 68 
genetic infiltration 59 
Gentiles 47 
German infants 59 
Germans 2, 31 
Germany 7, 11, 15, 30, 

ghettoes 19 
gnostic 68 
Gnosticism 68, 69 
Gnostics 68 
God 67, 79 
"God is absorbed" 41 
"God's Race" 3 1 
"God-people" 48, 58 
gods 45, 62 
gods do not exist 42 
goetae 40, 75 
Goldman, Rabbi So- 
lomon 4 1 

Gospel According to 
the Hebrews 66 
Gospel of Matthew 66 
Gospels 68 
gospels 75, 77 
Graeco-Romans 76 
Gratian 65 
Greatness That Was Baby- 

lon, The 50 
Greek 17, 19, 20, 43 
Greek educational sys- 
tem 20 

Greek geographers 36 
Greek name 72 
Greek names 3 1 
Greek pronunciation 

Greeks 19, 26, 29, 40, 

grimoire 48 
guilt 79 
gymnasia 19 
gymnasiarchs 23 


Haiti 28 
hatred 5 
Hebrew 4 1 
Hebrew language 4 1 
Hebrew Thought Com- 
pared with Greek 43 
heresy 65, 66 
heretic 69 
heretics 65, 66 
Herod 18 
Herodotus 36 
Hidden Tyranny, The 1 1 
"Higher Purpose" 39, 

highest law of every spe- 
cies 39 

Hindu Brahma 61 
Historia 73 
Hitler 3, 7 
hoax 2 

Hoax of the Twentieth 
Century, The 3 
hoaxes 62, 78 
holocaust 2, 8 



holy books 47 
Holy Communion 7 1 
Holy Spirit 68 
holy water 59 
Homeric traditions 55 
homosexuality 67 
honor 25, 27 
House of Lords 13 
How and Wells 36 
human rights 78 
human sacrifice 47 
hypocrisy 41, 43 


Iceland 25 
ideals 52 
ignorance 48 
ignorant barbarians 78 
immigrants 31, 33 
immigration 30 
immigration officers 24 
"Immortal Jewish Peo- 
ple" 39 

immortality 62 
incest 7 1 
income 82 
Indian tribes 26 
Indo-European languag- 
es 43 

Indo-Europeans 74 
Indus Valley 35 
inferior 45 
Infinity 62 

inheritance of specific 
mental traits 60 
innate superiority 45 
insanity 42 
instinct 55, 56 
instinctive hatred 43 
insurrection 22 

Integrates Judentum 59 
internal subversion 47 
invaders 46 
invasion 29 
irrational cults 79 
Isaiah 49 
Israel 60 
itacism 74 


Jerome 67, 69 
Jerusalem 6, 32 
Jesus 35, 64, 66, 67, 70, 
Jesus ben Simon 6 
Jewesses 38, 59 
Jewish blood 59 
Jewish Conspiracy of 
117 50 

Jewish government 19 
Jewish kings 74 
Jewish Law 46 
Jewish mentality 37, 43 
Jewish mind 42 
Jewish papyri 49 
Jewish People 4 1 
Jewish perception of re- 
ality 43 

Jewish sects 40 
Jews as a race 35 
Jews in Rome 19 
Jews Must Live 15 
Jews' determination to 
exterminate the Aryans 

Jews' ideal methods 37 
Jews' story-book 49 
John the Baptist 68 
Joseph 36 

Josephus7, 30, 31, 32 
journalists 83 
journals 82 

Judaea 30, 66, 73 
Judaeo-Christian 79 
jungles 81 
justice 52 


Kabbalah 48 
Kabbalistic 5 1 
Kastein, Dr. Joseph 4 1 
Kenny, Mary 79 
Khazars (Turko-Mongo- 
lians) 12 

"King of the Jews" 74 
Kipling 52 
Klein, Henry 10 
Koestermann 73, 75 
koine 43 

Ladino 43 

large cities 8 1 

Latin 17, 70 

Latin America 78 

law of life 25 

legislation 46 

Les livres secrets des Gnos- 

tiques d'Egypte 69 

Liberalism 79 

Liberals 79 

lion 25 

Livia 18 

Loeb series 22, 75 

Long Island 24 

Lord Galloway 13 

Lord Harrington 13, 82 

lust 67 

Luther 51, 65 

lysergic acid 61 


Magi 35, 36 
Magian 65 



magic 48, 61 
magic stone 64 
Magophonia 36 
Mahomet 50 
mammals 61 
Manetho 3 1 
Marais 62 
Marais, Eugene 61 
Marcus Julius Agrippa 

Marduk 49 
Mark Antony 18 
Marranos 27, 48 
Marsanes 68 
martyrs 67 
Marx, Karl 73 
masquerade 3 1 
massacres 31, 57 
masses 83 

massive massacres 52 
"Master Race" 38, 45, 

Media 35 

Mediaeval Europe 65 
Mediaeval knights 25 
Medicean manuscript 

"men create God in 
their own image" 42 
mendacity 32, 41 
menorah 3 
mescaline 61 
Messiah 74 
metempsychosis 61 
method 36 
Middle Ages 48, 78 
Minucius Felix 70 
miracle 62 
miracles 61 
miscegenation 82 
Mithra 64, 68 

modern art 43 
modern Canaanites 53 
modus operandi 37 
mongrelization 31, 57 
monkeys 61 
monotheism 50, 7 1 
Montagu, Ashley 3 1 
Montanist 69 
Montanus 70 
moon 29 
moral 39 

moral restraints 83 
morality 63 
Mormons 64 
Moses 33, 68 
murder 39 
mutilated 81 
M^y Friends, the Baboons 

myth 29 

mythical figure 64 
mythology 42 
mythology, rejected 78 
myths 64 


Naasenes 67 
Nabonidus 49, 50 
names 28, 31 
National Socialist 3 
National Vanguard 
Books 11, 15 
nationalism of Israel 41 
natural aristocracy 82 
Nazarenes 66, 16 
Near East 68 
Negroes from the jungle 

Nero 73 

New Jerusalem 24, 70 
New Testament 35, 66, 
73, 74, 76 

New York 19 
New York City 12, 24 
Nicotheus 68 
Nietzsche 62 
non-Christians 48 
Norse legends 55 
North Africa 42 
Nossig, Dr. Alfred 59 
nudity 67 


objective 81 

objective reality 41 

occult 6 1 

Octavius 70 

oecumene 24 

Old Persian 36 

Old Testament 29, 32, 

36, 37, 74, 77 

Onias 6 

open conquest 29 

open opposition 82 

open warfare 29 

oppressed 52 

original sin 67 

orthodox 65, 66, 68, 69, 


Osiris 32, 33, 50 

Ouida 14 

outwitted our race 42 

ownership of the entire 

earth 42 

pagan emperors 67 
pagan historians 47 
pagan myths 7 1 
pagans 46 
Palestine 8, 32, 75 
Parliament 82 
pathos 63 
Paul 66 


Pei-ho 9 
perception 43 
persecuted minority 52 
persecution 10, 20, 24, 
46, 67, 82 
Persia 36, 37 
Persian Empire 35, 36, 

Persians 49 
Pfefferkorn 10,51 
Philipoemen 40 
Philo 30 

Philo Judaeus 29 
Phoenician 43 
Phosilampes 68 
Phrygia 70 
physical courage 26 
physically strong 28 
physically weak 28 
Pico, Giovanni 5 1 
piety 62 
pity 79 
planning 26 
plight of our race 8 1 
Pliny 75 
polytheism 50 
Pontius Pilatus 73 
population 27 
pork 48 

Post-Historic Man 7 
predators 57 
preys on our species 56 
primitive minds 42 
privileges 22, 49 
progressive weakening 
of our race 57 
promiscuity 67 
prophets of Israel 33 
proselytes 45, 76 
proselytizers 45 
Protestant 50 

Protestantism 77 
Protocols of the Elders of 
lion 12, 37, 55, 51 
Ptolemies 19 


rabbi 2 

racial arrogance 45 
racial cohesion 39 
racial consciousness 6 
racial mentality 25, 41 
racial mentality of the 
Jews 39 

racial solidarity 7 
Ramee, Louise 14 
raped 81 
rational creed 79 
Reed, Douglas 13 
Reformation 12, 48, 50 
refugees 28 
religion 39, 61, 64, 78 
religiosity 61 
religious 79 
religious agitation 49 
religious belief 62 
religious civil war 49 
religious civil wars 48 
religious drive 79 
religious myths 42 
religious professions 53 
religious toleration 32 
Renaissance 48 
reparations 9 
resentment 45 
Reshgalutha 50 
residue 78 
Reuchlin 5 1 
reversion to total bar- 
barism 52 

revolutionary massacres 
righteousness 5 1 

rioting 73 

riots 19, 20 

ritual murders 47, 75 

robbed 81 

Roman emperors 68 

Roman Empire 50, 64, 

65, 76, 77 

Roman governor of 

Judaea 74 

Romans 19, 29, 76 

Rome 50, 72, 73 

Rome, burning of 73 

Roosevelt, Franklin 8, 


Roth, Samuel 15 

rules of evidence 47 

Russia 37 

Russian intelligence 12 

"sacred mushroom" 68 
Saggs, Professor H. W. 

salesmen 83 
Samuel, Maurice 39 
savages 53, 81 
Saviors 68 
Schiller, Craig 3 1 
schizophrenia 56 
Schuld und Schicksal 7 
Scientific American 69 
Sebazius 50 
secret directorate 55 
secret police of Russia 

sedition 3 1 

Seidenberg, Roderick 7 
Select Papyri 22 
Seleucids 6 
Semitic 31, 50, 72 
Semitic languages 43 
Senate 18 


Seneca 66 
sentimentality 52 
Septuagint 32, 74 
Set 32, 33 
Seth 32, 68 
sexual mutilations 45 
Sin (Babylonian God) 

Sinai peninsula 3 1 
Sinon 26 

"six million" 2, 3, 30 
slave 83 
slaves 72 
Smith, Joseph 64 
snakes 67 
social gospel 64 
social justice 52 
social utility of supernat- 
ural sanctions 63 
soothsayers 83 
sorcery 48 

Soul of the Ape, The 6 1 
South Africa 40 
special privileges 19 
Spengler 62, 65 
spiritual salvation 67 
St. Thomas 65 
Stalin 82 
Stoic 71 

Stoic monotheism 77 
strategic oases 50 
strategy 26 
Strathmore 14 
strength and stealth 25 
Stuart, Lyle 3 1 
subconscious reactions 

subversion 30 
Suetonius 72 
suicide of our race 77 
Suicide of the West 15 

Sumeria 35 
Sumerian religion 35 
Sumerians 35 
sun 29 

Sunday Telegraph, The 79 
superiority 10, 39, 83 
supernatural beings 39 
superstition 82 
superstitions 36, 45, 78 
superstitious human be- 
ings 42 

suppressing 82 
survival 83 
synagogues 73 
Syria 32 


taboos 45, 46 

Tacitus 72 

Talmud 10, 11 

Tat 68 

Tattnall, Josiah 9 

taxes 23 

teachers 83 

temple in Jerusalem 47 

Ten Commandments 


terrorism 3 

Tertullian 66, 69, 70, 


Texas Long-horn 57 

Theodosius 65 

Thirty Years' War 47 

Tiberius 18, 66, 74, 75 

Tiberius Claudius 

Archibius 23 

tiger 25 

Toth 68 

trade routes 50 

tradesmen 83 

traditional Christianity 

of the West 40 

Traditionalist Catholics 

traitor 13 
translators 32 
treachery 27 
treason 8 
tribal deity 77 
Trojan Horse 26 
Trojans 26 
Trotsky 73 
Twain, Mark 27 
"tyranny of human 
laws" 71 


U. S. S. Liberty 6 
U.S. Naval Academy 9 
U.S. Navy 9 
"underprivileged" 52, 

United States 7, 9, 15, 
universal plague 23 
Untergang 65 
upper classes 3 1 
usury 48 


vampire bats 39 

Van Seters, John 3 1 

Vedas 55 

Vergil 63 

Verwoerd 40 

vices 82 

Vietnam 9, 28 

violence 46 

von Hutten, Ulrich 5 1 


Waite, Arthur E. 48 
Wars of Religion 5 1 


Watson, Sir William 63 

Weizmann 8 

Western Hemisphere 


Western Semitic 43 

whining dogs 76 

white inhabitants 8 1 

witchcraft 6 1 

wolf pack 57 

wolves 55 

words 83 

"Words are the most 

powerful drugs used by You Gentiles 39 


mankind" 52 

world peace 52 

worshipping its own im- 
age 42 


Ya'o 32 
Yahweh 32 
Yehoshua' 75 
Yeshua' 75 
Yiddish 43, 74 

Zervan 68 

Zionism Rules the World 

Zionists 6, 7, 11, 13, 57 

Zoroaster 68 

Zoroastrian 77 

Zoroastrianism 35